BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael Rosenblum

Michael Rosenblum contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsNeurons and Cognitionnlin.AO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Combining Covariate Adjustment with Group Sequential, Information Adaptive Designs to Improve Randomized Trial Efficiency

In clinical trials, there is potential to improve precision and reduce the required sample size by appropriately adjusting for baseline variables in the statistical analysis. This is called covariate adjustment. Despite recommendations by regulatory agencies in favor of covariate adjustment, it remains underutilized leading to inefficient trials. We address two obstacles that make it challenging to use covariate adjustment. A first obstacle is the incompatibility of many covariate adjusted estimators with commonly used boundaries in group sequential designs (GSDs). A second obstacle is the uncertainty at the design stage about how much precision gain will result from covariate adjustment. We propose a method that modifies the original estimator so that it becomes compatible with GSDs, while increasing or leaving unchanged the estimator's precision. Our approach allows the use of any asymptotically linear estimator, which covers many estimators used in randomized trials. Building on this, we propose using an information adaptive design, that is, continuing the trial until the required information level is achieved. Such a design adapts to the amount of precision gain and can lead to faster, more efficient trials, without sacrificing validity or power. We evaluate estimator performance in simulations that mimic features of a completed stroke trial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation to Estimate Treatment Effect with Longitudinal Continuous or Binary Data: A Systematic Evaluation of 28 Diabetes Clinical Trials

The primary analysis of clinical trials in diabetes therapeutic area often involves a mixed-model repeated measure (MMRM) approach to estimate the average treatment effect for longitudinal continuous outcome, and a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) approach for longitudinal binary outcome. In this paper, we considered another estimator of the average treatment effect, called targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE). This estimator can be a one-step alternative to model either continuous or binary outcome. We compared those estimators by simulation studies and by analyzing real data from 28 diabetes clinical trials. The simulations involved different missing data scenarios, and the real data sets covered a wide range of possible distributions of the outcome and covariates in real-life clinical trials for diabetes drugs with different mechanisms of action. For all the settings, adjusted estimators tended to be more efficient than the unadjusted one. In the setting of longitudinal continuous outcome, the MMRM approach with visits and baseline variables interaction appeared to dominate the performance of the MMRM considering the main effects only for the baseline variables while showing better or comparable efficiency to the TMLE estimator in both simulations and data applications. For modeling longitudinal binary outcome, TMLE generally outperformed GLMM in terms of relative efficiency, and its avoidance of the cumbersome covariance fitting procedure from GLMM makes TMLE a more advantageous estimator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

High-Order Phase Reduction for Coupled Oscillators

We explore the phase reduction in networks of coupled oscillators in the higher orders of the coupling parameter. For coupled Stuart-Landau oscillators, where the phase can be introduced explicitly, we develop an analytic perturbation procedure to allow for the obtaining of the higher-order approximation explicitly. We demonstrate this by deriving the second-order phase equations for a network of three Stuart-Landau oscillators. For systems where explicit expressions of the phase are not available, we present a numerical procedure that constructs the phase dynamics equations for a small network of coupled units. We apply this approach to a network of three van der Pol oscillators and reveal components in the coupling with different scaling in the interaction strength.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Model-Robust Inference for Clinical Trials that Improve Precision by Stratified Randomization and Covariate Adjustment

Two commonly used methods for improving precision and power in clinical trials are stratified randomization and covariate adjustment. However, many trials do not fully capitalize on the combined precision gains from these two methods, which can lead to wasted resources in terms of sample size and trial duration. We derive consistency and asymptotic normality of model-robust estimators that combine these two methods, and show that these estimators can lead to substantial gains in precision and power. Our theorems cover a class of estimators that handle continuous, binary, and time-to-event outcomes; missing outcomes under the missing at random assumption are handled as well. For each estimator, we give a formula for a consistent variance estimator that is model-robust and that fully captures variance reductions from stratified randomization and covariate adjustment. Also, we give the first proof (to the best of our knowledge) of consistency and asymptotic normality of the Kaplan-Meier estimator under stratified randomization, and we derive its asymptotic variance. The above results also hold for the biased-coin covariate-adaptive design. We demonstrate our results using three completed, phase 3, randomized trial data sets of treatments for substance use disorder, where the variance reduction due to stratified randomization and covariate adjustment ranges from 1% to 36%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Reinforcement learning for suppression of collective activity in oscillatory ensembles

We present a use of modern data-based machine learning approaches to suppress self-sustained collective oscillations typically signaled by ensembles of degenerative neurons in the brain. The proposed hybrid model relies on two major components: an environment of oscillators and a policy-based reinforcement learning block. We report a model-agnostic synchrony control based on proximal policy optimization and two artificial neural networks in an Actor-Critic configuration. A class of physically meaningful reward functions enabling the suppression of collective oscillatory mode is proposed. The synchrony suppression is demonstrated for two models of neuronal populations -- for the ensembles of globally coupled limit-cycle Bonhoeffer-van der Pol oscillators and for the bursting Hindmarsh--Rose neurons.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access