BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael Liut

Michael Liut contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CYMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionHuman-Computer InteractionRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

A Comparative Study of Technical Writing Feedback Quality: Evaluating LLMs, SLMs, and Humans in Computer Science Topics

Feedback is a critical component of the learning process, particularly in computer science education. This study investigates the quality of feedback generated by Large Language Models (LLMs), Small Language Models (SLMs), compared with human feedback, in three computer science course with technical writing components: an introductory computer science course (CS2), a third-year advanced systems course (operating systems), and a third-year writing course (a topics course on artificial intelligence). Using a mixed-methods approach which integrates quantitative Likert-scale questions with qualitative commentary, we analyze the student perspective on feedback quality, evaluated based on multiple criteria, including readability, detail, specificity, actionability, helpfulness, and overall quality. The analysis reveals that in the larger upper-year operating systems course ($N=80$), SLMs and LLMs are perceived to deliver clear, actionable, and well-structured feedback, while humans provide more contextually nuanced guidance. As for the high-enrollment CS2 course ($N=176$) showed the same preference for the AI tools' clarity and breadth, but students noted that AI feedback sometimes lacked the concise, straight-to-the-point, guidance offered by humans. Conversely, in the smaller upper-year technical writing course on AI topics ($N=7$), all students preferred feedback from the course instructor, who was able to provide clear, specific, and personalized feedback, compared to the more general and less targeted AI-based feedback. We also highlight the scalability of AI-based feedback by focusing on its effectiveness at large scale. Our findings underscore the potential of hybrid approaches that combine AI and human feedback to achieve efficient and high-quality feedback at scale.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Deep Camera Pose Regression Using Pseudo-LiDAR

An accurate and robust large-scale localization system is an integral component for active areas of research such as autonomous vehicles and augmented reality. To this end, many learning algorithms have been proposed that predict 6DOF camera pose from RGB or RGB-D images. However, previous methods that incorporate depth typically treat the data the same way as RGB images, often adding depth maps as additional channels to RGB images and passing them through convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In this paper, we show that converting depth maps into pseudo-LiDAR signals, previously shown to be useful for 3D object detection, is a better representation for camera localization tasks by projecting point clouds that can accurately determine 6DOF camera pose. This is demonstrated by first comparing localization accuracies of a network operating exclusively on pseudo-LiDAR representations, with networks operating exclusively on depth maps. We then propose FusionLoc, a novel architecture that uses pseudo-LiDAR to regress a 6DOF camera pose. FusionLoc is a dual stream neural network, which aims to remedy common issues with typical 2D CNNs operating on RGB-D images. The results from this architecture are compared against various other state-of-the-art deep pose regression implementations using the 7 Scenes dataset. The findings are that FusionLoc performs better than a number of other camera localization methods, with a notable improvement being, on average, 0.33m and 4.35° more accurate than RGB-D PoseNet. By proving the validity of using pseudo-LiDAR signals over depth maps for localization, there are new considerations when implementing large-scale localization systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Increasing Students' Engagement to Reminder Emails Through Multi-Armed Bandits

Conducting randomized experiments in education settings raises the question of how we can use machine learning techniques to improve educational interventions. Using Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) algorithms like Thompson Sampling (TS) in adaptive experiments can increase students' chances of obtaining better outcomes by increasing the probability of assignment to the most optimal condition (arm), even before an intervention completes. This is an advantage over traditional A/B testing, which may allocate an equal number of students to both optimal and non-optimal conditions. The problem is the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Even though adaptive policies aim to collect enough information to allocate more students to better arms reliably, past work shows that this may not be enough exploration to draw reliable conclusions about whether arms differ. Hence, it is of interest to provide additional uniform random (UR) exploration throughout the experiment. This paper shows a real-world adaptive experiment on how students engage with instructors' weekly email reminders to build their time management habits. Our metric of interest is open email rates which tracks the arms represented by different subject lines. These are delivered following different allocation algorithms: UR, TS, and what we identified as TS† - which combines both TS and UR rewards to update its priors. We highlight problems with these adaptive algorithms - such as possible exploitation of an arm when there is no significant difference - and address their causes and consequences. Future directions includes studying situations where the early choice of the optimal arm is not ideal and how adaptive algorithms can address them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access