BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Michael Beil

Michael Beil contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Biological Physicscond-mat.softphysics.optics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Comparison of nanomechanical properties of in vivo and in vitro keratin 8/18 networks

In our work we compare the mechanical properties of the extracted keratin cytoskeleton of pancreatic carcinoma cells with the mechanical properties of in vitro assembled keratin 8/18 networks. For this purpose we use microrheology measurements with embedded tracer beads. This method is a suitable tool, because the size of the beads compared to the meshsize of the network allows us to treat the network as a continuum. Observing the beads motion with a CCD-High-Speed-Camera then leads to the dynamic shear modulus. Our measurements show lower storage moduli with increasing distance between the rim of the nucleus and the bead, but no clear tendency for the loss modulus. The same measurement method applied to in vitro assembled keratin 8/18 networks shows different characteristics of storage and loss moduli. The storage modulus is one order of magnitude lower than that of the extracted cytoskeleton and the loss modulus is higher. We draw conclusions on the network topology of both keratin network types based on the mechanical behaviour.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Active multi-point microrheology of cytoskeletal networks

Active microrheology is a valuable tool to determine viscoelastic properties of polymer networks. Observing the beads response to the excitation of a reference leads to dynamic and morphological information of the material. In this work we present an expansion of the well-known active two-point microrheology. By measuring the response of multiple particles in the viscoelastic medium in response to the excitation of a reference particle we are able to determine the force propagation in the polymer network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Interaction of Epithelial Cells with Surfaces and Surfaces Decorated by Molecules

A detailed understanding of the interface between living cells and substrate materials is of rising importance in many fields of medicine, biology and biotechnology. Cells at interfaces often form epithelia. The physical barrier that they form is one of their main functions. It is governed by the properties of the networks forming the cytoskeleton systems and by cell-to-cell contacts. Different substrates with varying surface properties modify the migration velocity of the cells. On the one hand one can change the materials composition. Organic and inorganic materials induce differing migration velocities in the same cell system. Within the same class of materials, a change of the surface stiffness or of the surface energy modifies the migration velocity, too. For our cell adhesion studies a variety of different, homogeneous substrates were used (polymers, bio-polymers, metals, oxides). In addition, an effective lithographic method, Polymer Blend Lithography (PBL), is reported, to produce patterned Self-Assembled Monolayers (SAM) on solid substrates featuring two or three different chemical functionalities. This we achieve without the use of conventional lithography like e-beam or UV lithography, only by using self-organization. These surfaces are decorated with a Teflon-like and with an amino-functionalized molecular layer. The resulting pattern is a copy of a previously created self-organized polymer pattern, featuring a scalable lateral domain size in the sub-micron range down below 100 nanometers. The resulting monolayer pattern features a high chemical and biofunctional contrast with feature sizes in the range of cell adhesion complexes like e.g. focal adhesion points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access