Paper detail

Comparison of nanomechanical properties of in vivo and in vitro keratin 8/18 networks

In our work we compare the mechanical properties of the extracted keratin cytoskeleton of pancreatic carcinoma cells with the mechanical properties of in vitro assembled keratin 8/18 networks. For this purpose we use microrheology measurements with embedded tracer beads. This method is a suitable tool, because the size of the beads compared to the meshsize of the network allows us to treat the network as a continuum. Observing the beads motion with a CCD-High-Speed-Camera then leads to the dynamic shear modulus. Our measurements show lower storage moduli with increasing distance between the rim of the nucleus and the bead, but no clear tendency for the loss modulus. The same measurement method applied to in vitro assembled keratin 8/18 networks shows different characteristics of storage and loss moduli. The storage modulus is one order of magnitude lower than that of the extracted cytoskeleton and the loss modulus is higher. We draw conclusions on the network topology of both keratin network types based on the mechanical behaviour.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.