BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Micha Mandel

Micha Mandel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Spatial modeling of randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles with application to forensic shoeprint analysis

Footwear comparison is used to link between a suspect's shoe and a footprint found at a crime scene. Investigators compare the two items using randomly acquired characteristics (RACs), such as scratches or holes. However, to date, the distribution of RAC characteristics has not been investigated thoroughly, and the evidential value of RACs is yet to be explored. An important question concerns the distribution of the location of RACs on shoe soles, which can serve as a benchmark for comparison. The location of RACs is modeled here as a point process over the shoe sole and a data set of 386 independent shoes is used to estimate its rate function. The analysis is somewhat complicated as the shoes are differentiated by shape, level of wear and tear and contact surface. This paper presents methods that take into account these challenges, either by using natural cubic splines on high resolution data, or by using a piecewise-constant model on larger regions defined by experts' knowledge. It is shown that RACs are likely to appear at certain locations, corresponding to the foot's morphology. The results can guide investigators in determining the evidential value of footprint comparison.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Variance function estimation in quantitative mass spectrometry with application to iTRAQ labeling

This paper describes and compares two methods for estimating the variance function associated with iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) isotopic labeling in quantitative mass spectrometry based proteomics. Measurements generated by the mass spectrometer are proportional to the concentration of peptides present in the biological sample. However, the iTRAQ reporter signals are subject to errors that depend on the peptide amounts. The variance function of the errors is therefore an essential parameter for evaluating the results, but estimating it is complicated, as the number of nuisance parameters increases with sample size while the number of replicates for each peptide remains small. Two experiments that were conducted with the sole goal of estimating the variance function and its stability over time are analyzed, and the resulting estimated variance function is used to analyze an experiment targeting aberrant signaling cascades in cells harboring distinct oncogenic mutations. Methods for constructing conservative $p$-values and confidence intervals are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Are adaptive allocation designs beneficial for improving power in binary response trials?

We consider the classical problem of selecting the best of two treatments in clinical trials with binary response. The target is to find the design that maximizes the power of the relevant test. Many papers use a normal approximation to the power function and claim that Neyman allocation that assigns subjects to treatment groups according to the ratio of the responses' standard deviations, should be used. As the standard deviations are unknown, an adaptive design is often recommended. The asymptotic justification of this approach is arguable, since it uses the normal approximation in tails where the error in the approximation is larger than the estimated quantity. We consider two different approaches for optimality of designs that are related to Pitman and Bahadur definitions of relative efficiency of tests. We prove that the optimal allocation according to the Pitman criterion is the balanced allocation and that the optimal allocation according to the Bahadur approach depends on the unknown parameters. Exact calculations reveal that the optimal allocation according to Bahadur is often close to the balanced design, and the powers of both are comparable to the Neyman allocation for small sample sizes and are generally better for large experiments. Our findings have important implications to the design of experiments, as the balanced design is proved to be optimal or close to optimal and the need for the complications involved in following an adaptive design for the purpose of increasing the power of tests is therefore questionable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access