Paper detail

Spatial modeling of randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles with application to forensic shoeprint analysis

Footwear comparison is used to link between a suspect's shoe and a footprint found at a crime scene. Investigators compare the two items using randomly acquired characteristics (RACs), such as scratches or holes. However, to date, the distribution of RAC characteristics has not been investigated thoroughly, and the evidential value of RACs is yet to be explored. An important question concerns the distribution of the location of RACs on shoe soles, which can serve as a benchmark for comparison. The location of RACs is modeled here as a point process over the shoe sole and a data set of 386 independent shoes is used to estimate its rate function. The analysis is somewhat complicated as the shoes are differentiated by shape, level of wear and tear and contact surface. This paper presents methods that take into account these challenges, either by using natural cubic splines on high resolution data, or by using a piecewise-constant model on larger regions defined by experts' knowledge. It is shown that RACs are likely to appear at certain locations, corresponding to the foot's morphology. The results can guide investigators in determining the evidential value of footprint comparison.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.