BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Menachem Kojman

Menachem Kojman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.LOmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

15works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Ramsey theory over partitions I: Positive Ramsey relations from forcing axioms

In this series of papers, we advance Ramsey theory of colorings over partitions. In this part, a correspondence between anti-Ramsey properties of partitions and chain conditions of the natural forcing notions that homogenize colorings over them is uncovered. At the level of the first uncountable cardinal this gives rise to a duality theorem under Martin's Axiom: a function $p:[ω_1]^2\rightarrowω$ witnesses a weak negative Ramsey relation when $p$ plays the role of a coloring if and only if a positive Ramsey relation holds over $p$ when $p$ plays the role of a partition. The consistency of positive Ramsey relations over partitions does not stop at the first uncountable cardinal: it is established that at any prescribed uncountable cardinal these relations follow from forcing axioms without large cardinal strength. This result solves in particular two problems from [CKS21].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Ramsey theory over partitions II: Negative Ramsey relations and pump-up theorems

In this series of papers we advance Ramsey theory of colorings over partitions. In this part, we concentrate on anti-Ramsey relations, or, as they are better known, strong colorings, and in particular solve two problems from [CKS21]. It is shown that for every infinite cardinal $λ$, a strong coloring on $λ^+$ by $λ$ colors over a partition can be stretched to one with $λ^{+}$ colors over the same partition. Also, a sufficient condition is given for when a strong coloring witnessing $Pr_1(\ldots)$ over a partition may be improved to witness $Pr_0(\ldots)$. Since the classical theory corresponds to the special case of a partition with just one cell, the two results generalize pump-up theorems due to Eisworth and Shelah, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Ramsey theory over partitions III: Strongly Luzin sets and partition relations

The strongest type of coloring of pairs of countable ordinals, gotten by Todorcevic from a strongly Luzin set, is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a nonmeager set of reals of size $\aleph_1$. In the other direction, it is shown that the existence of both a strongly Luzin set and a coherent Souslin tree is compatible with the existence of a countable partition of pairs of countable ordinals such that no coloring is strong over it. This clarifies the interaction between a gallery of coloring assertions going back to Luzin and Sierpinski a hundred years ago.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the arithmetic of density

The $κ$-density of a cardinal $μ\geκ$ is the least cardinality of a dense collection of $κ$-subsets of $μ$ and is denoted by $\mathcal D(μ,κ)$. The Singular Density Hypothesis (SDH) for a singular cardinal $μ$ of cofinality $cfμ=κ$ is the equation $\mathcal D(μ,κ)=μ^+$. The Generalized Density Hypothesis (GDH) for $μ$ and $λ$ such that $λ\leμ$ is: $\mathcal D(μ,λ)=μ$ if $cfμ\not=cfλ$ and $\mathcal D(μ,λ)=μ^+$ if $cfμ=cfλ$. Density is shown to satisfy Silver's theorem. The most important case is: Theorem 2.6. If $κ=cfκ<θ=cfμ<μ$ and the set of cardinals $λ<μ$ of cofinality $κ$ that satisfy the \textsf{SDH} is stationary in $μ$ then the SDH holds at $μ$. A more general version is given in Theorem 2.8 A corollary of Theorem 2.6 is: Theorem 3.2 If the Singular Density Hypothesis holds for all sufficiently large singular cardinals of some fixed cofinality $κ$, then for all cardinals $λ$ with $cfλ\ge κ$, for all sufficiently large $μ$, the GDH holds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Splitting families of sets in ZFC

Miller's 1937 splitting theorem was proved for pairs of cardinals $(\n,ρ)$ in which $n$ is finite and $ρ$ is infinite. An extension of Miller's theorem is proved here in ZFC for pairs of cardinals $(ν,ρ)$ in which $ν$ is arbitrary and $ρ\ge \beth_\om(ν)$. The proof uses a new general method that is based on Shelah's revises Generalized Continuum Hypothesis theorem. Upper bounds on conflict-free coloring numbers of families of sets and a general comparison theorem follow as corollaries of the main theorem. Other corollaries eliminate the use of additional axioms from splitting theorems due to Erdos, Hajnal, Komjath, Juhasz and Shelah.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

Continuous Ramsey theory on Polish spaces and covering the plane by functions

We investigate the Ramsey theory of continuous pair-colorings on complete, separable metric spaces, and apply the results to the problem of covering a plane by functions. The homogeneity number hm(c) of a pair-coloring c:[X]^2 -> 2 is the number of c-homogeneous subsets of X needed to cover X. We isolate two continuous pair-colorings on the Cantor space 2^omega, c_min and c_max, which satisfy hm(c_min)\le hm(c_max) and prove: 1. For every Polish space X and every continuous pair-coloring c:[X]^2 -> 2 with hm(c) uncountable: hm(c)= hm(c_min) or hm(c)=hm(c_max) 2. There is a model of set theory in which hm(c_min)=aleph_1 and hm(c_max)=aleph_2 (The consistency of hm(c_min) = 2^aleph0 and of hm(c_max) < 2^aleph0 is known) We prove that hm(c_min) is equal to the covering number of (2^omega)^2 by graphs of Lipschitz functions and their reflections on the diagonal. An iteration of an optimal forcing notion associated to c_min gives: There is a model of set theory in which 1. R^2 is coverable by aleph1 graphs and reflections of graphs of continuous real functions; 2. R^2 is not coverable by aleph1 graphs and reflections of graphs of Lipschitz real functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1997arXiv

Rules and Reals

A ``k-rule" is a sequence A=((A_n,B_n):n<omega) of pairwise disjoint sets B_n, each of cardinality at most k, where A_n is a subset of B_n. A set X of natural numbers (a ``real'') follows a rule A if for infinitely many n we have that the intersection of X with B_n is exactly A_n. There are obvious cardinal invariants resulting from this definition: the least number of reals needed to follow all k-rules, s_k, and the least number of k-rules without a real following all of them, r_k. We investigate these cardinal invariants and their connection to some well-known cardinals from Cichon's diagram. The original motivation for discovering rules was an attempt to construct a maximal homogeneous family over omega. The consistency of such a family is still open.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

On universal graphs without cliques or withour large bipartite graphs

For every uncountable cardinal $λ$, suitable negations of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis imply: - For all infinite $α$ and $β$, there is no universal $K_{α,β}$-free graphs in $λ$ - For all $α\ge 3$, there is no universal $K_α$-free graph in $λ$ The instance $K_{ω,ω_1}$ for $λ=\aleph_1$ was settled by Komjath and Pach from the principle $\diamondsuit(ω_1)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Representing embeddability as set inclusion

A few steps are made towards representation theory of embeddability among uncountable graphs. A monotone class of graphs is defined by forbidding countable subgraphs, related to the graph's end-structure. Using a combinatorial theorem of Shelah it is proved: - The complexity of the class in every regular uncountable $ł>\aleph_1$ is at least $λ^+ + \sup\{μ^{\aleph_0}:μ^+<λ\}$ - For all regular uncountable $λ>\aleph_1$ there are $2^λ$ pairwise non embeddable graphs in the class having strong homogeneity properties. - It is characterized when some invariants of a graph $G\in \Cal G_λ$ have to be inherited by one of fewer than $λ$ subgraphs whose union covers $G$. All three results are obtained as corollaries of a representation theorem that asserts the existence of a surjective homomorphism from the relation of embeddability over isomorphism types of regular cardinality $λ>\aleph_1$ onto set inclusion over all subsets of reals or cardinality $λ$ or less. Continuity properties of the homomorphism are used to extend the first result to all singular cardinals below the first cardinal fixed point of second order. The first result shows that, unlike what Shelah showed in the class of all graphs, the relations of embeddability in this class is not independent of negations of the GCH.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1992arXiv

The universality spectrum of stable unsuperstable theories

It is shown that if T is stable unsuperstable, and aleph_1< lambda =cf(lambda)< 2^{aleph_0}, or 2^{aleph_0} < mu^+< lambda =cf(lambda)< mu^{aleph_0} then T has no universal model in cardinality lambda, and if e.g. aleph_omega < 2^{aleph_0} then T has no universal model in aleph_omega. These results are generalized to kappa =cf(kappa) < kappa (T) in the place of aleph_0. Also: if there is a universal model in lambda >|T|, T stable and kappa < kappa (T) then there is a universal tree of height kappa +1 in cardinality lambda .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access