Researcher profile

Melanie Weber

Melanie Weber contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Approximate $k$-Coloring with Recursive Warm Starts

Node coloring is the task of assigning colors to the nodes of a graph such that no two adjacent nodes have the same color, while using as few colors as possible. It is the most widely studied instance of graph coloring and of central importance in graph theory; major results include the Four Color Theorem and work on the Hadwiger-Nelson Problem. As an abstraction of classical combinatorial optimization tasks, such as scheduling and resource allocation, it is also rich in practical applications. Here, we focus on a relaxed version, approximate $k$-coloring, which is the task of assigning at most $k$ colors to the nodes of a graph such that the number of edges whose vertices have the same color is approximately minimized. While classical approaches leverage mathematical programming or SAT solvers, recent studies have explored the use of machine learning. We follow this route and explore the use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for node coloring. We first present an optimized differentiable algorithm that improves a prior approach by Schuetz et al. with orthogonal node feature initialization and a loss function that penalizes conflicting edges more heavily when their endpoints have higher degree; the latter inspired by the classical result that a graph is $k$-colorable if and only if its $k$-core is $k$-colorable. Next, we introduce a lightweight greedy local search algorithm and show that it may be improved by recursively computing a $(k-1)$-coloring to use as a warm start. We then show that applying such recursive warm starts to the GNN approach leads to further improvements. Numerical experiments on a range of different graph structures show that while the local search algorithms perform best on small inputs, the GNN exhibits superior performance at scale. The recursive warm start may be of independent interest beyond graph coloring for local search methods for combinatorial optimization.

preprint2026arXiv

Towards Distillation Guarantees under Algorithmic Alignment for Combinatorial Optimization

Distillation transfers knowledge from a large model trained on broad data to a smaller, more efficient model suitable for deployment. In structured prediction settings, prior knowledge about the task can guide the choice of a target architecture that is algorithmically aligned with the underlying problem. Building on recent learning-theoretic analyses of decision-tree (DT) distillation (Boix-Adsera, 2024), we study when distillation succeeds for combinatorial optimization tasks. We focus on the case where the target model is a graph neural network whose architecture is aligned with a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm for the task. Assuming that the source model is sufficiently rich, formalized through the linear representation hypothesis (LRH) (Elhage et al., 2022; Park et al., 2024), we show that the distillation problem can be solved efficiently in the complexity parameters of the DP transition function, represented as a DT. Our results provide a rigorous sufficient condition for successful distillation in the flavour of algorithmic alignment.

preprint2024arXiv

On the hardness of learning under symmetries

We study the problem of learning equivariant neural networks via gradient descent. The incorporation of known symmetries ("equivariance") into neural nets has empirically improved the performance of learning pipelines, in domains ranging from biology to computer vision. However, a rich yet separate line of learning theoretic research has demonstrated that actually learning shallow, fully-connected (i.e. non-symmetric) networks has exponential complexity in the correlational statistical query (CSQ) model, a framework encompassing gradient descent. In this work, we ask: are known problem symmetries sufficient to alleviate the fundamental hardness of learning neural nets with gradient descent? We answer this question in the negative. In particular, we give lower bounds for shallow graph neural networks, convolutional networks, invariant polynomials, and frame-averaged networks for permutation subgroups, which all scale either superpolynomially or exponentially in the relevant input dimension. Therefore, in spite of the significant inductive bias imparted via symmetry, actually learning the complete classes of functions represented by equivariant neural networks via gradient descent remains hard.

preprint2020arXiv

Optimal control with learning on the fly: a toy problem

We exhibit optimal control strategies for a simple toy problem in which the underlying dynamics depend on a parameter that is initially unknown and must be learned. We consider a cost function posed over a finite time interval, in contrast to much previous work that considers asymptotics as the time horizon tends to infinity. We study several different versions of the problem, including Bayesian control, in which we assume a prior distribution on the unknown parameter; and "agnostic" control, in which we assume nothing about the unknown parameter. For the agnostic problems, we compare our performance with that of an opponent who knows the value of the parameter. This comparison gives rise to several notions of "regret," and we obtain strategies that minimize the "worst-case regret" arising from the most unfavorable choice of the unknown parameter. In every case, the optimal strategy turns out to be a Bayesian strategy or a limit of Bayesian strategies.