BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Meghana M. Reddy

Meghana M. Reddy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Compatible Spanning Trees in Simple Drawings of $K_n$

For a simple drawing $D$ of the complete graph $K_n$, two (plane) subdrawings are compatible if their union is plane. Let $\mathcal{T}_D$ be the set of all plane spanning trees on $D$ and $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ be the compatibility graph that has a vertex for each element in $\mathcal{T}_D$ and two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding trees are compatible. We show, on the one hand, that $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ is connected if $D$ is a cylindrical, monotone, or strongly c-monotone drawing. On the other hand, we show that the subgraph of $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{T}_D)$ induced by stars, double stars, and twin stars is also connected. In all cases the diameter of the corresponding compatibility graph is at most linear in $n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Local Complexity of Polygons

Many problems in Discrete and Computational Geometry deal with simple polygons or polygonal regions. Many algorithms and data-structures perform considerably faster, if the underlying polygonal region has low local complexity. One obstacle to make this intuition rigorous, is the lack of a formal definition of local complexity. Here, we give two possible definitions and show how they are related in a combinatorial sense. We say that a polygon $P$ has point visibility width $w=pvw$, if there is no point $q\in P$ that sees more than $w$ reflex vertices. We say that a polygon $P$ has chord visibility width $w=cvw $, if there is no chord $c=\textrm{seg}(a,b)\subset P$ that sees more than w reflex vertices. We show that \[ cvw \leq pvw ^{O( pvw )},\] for any simple polygon. Furthermore, we show that there exists a simple polygon with \[ cvw \geq 2^{Ω( pvw )}.\]

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Simple Topological Drawings of $k$-Planar Graphs

Every finite graph admits a \emph{simple (topological) drawing}, that is, a drawing where every pair of edges intersects in at most one point. However, in combination with other restrictions simple drawings do not universally exist. For instance, \emph{$k$-planar graphs} are those graphs that can be drawn so that every edge has at most $k$ crossings (i.e., they admit a \emph{$k$-plane drawing}). It is known that for $k\le 3$, every $k$-planar graph admits a $k$-plane simple drawing. But for $k\ge 4$, there exist $k$-planar graphs that do not admit a $k$-plane simple drawing. Answering a question by Schaefer, we show that there exists a function $f : \mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}$ such that every $k$-planar graph admits an $f(k)$-plane simple drawing, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. Note that the function $f$ depends on $k$ only and is independent of the size of the graph. Furthermore, we develop an algorithm to show that every $4$-planar graph admits an $8$-plane simple drawing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access