BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Max Zhang

Max Zhang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceBiological PhysicsComputation and LanguageComputer VisionMachine Learningphysics.app-phphysics.ins-det

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Continuous quantification of viral plaque dynamics using ultra-large-area label-free imaging enables rapid antiviral susceptibility testing

The plaque reduction assay (PRA) remains the gold standard for antiviral susceptibility testing, evaluating drug potency by measuring reductions in plaque-forming units (PFUs). However, the traditional PRA is time-consuming, labor-intensive, prone to manual counting errors, and offers limited scalability. Moreover, its reliance on destructive fixation and chemical staining reduces the assay to a static, endpoint observation, obscuring the dynamic, time-resolved kinetics of dose-dependent viral inhibition. Here, we introduce a label-free, time-resolved PRA platform that transforms the conventional assay into a continuous, high-dimensional measurement of viral infection dynamics. Our system integrates a compact lens-free imaging setup with a custom-designed ultra-large-area (100 cm^2) thin-film transistor (TFT) image sensor and deep learning-based algorithms to autonomously quantify PFU dynamics within an incubator. Validated using herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) treated with acyclovir, the platform matched chemically-stained ground truth measurements with zero false positives while accelerating readout by ~26 hours. Crucially, our system revealed that increasing drug concentrations induce temporally distinct delays and suppress new PFU formation, enabling conclusive drug efficacy evaluations within ~60 hours post-infection. This scalable, label-free framework redefines antiviral susceptibility testing as a rapid, time-resolved and information-rich measurement framework, providing a generalizable platform for virology research, high-throughput drug screening, and clinical diagnostics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Why Do Safety Guardrails Degrade Across Languages?

Large language models exhibit safety degradation in non-English languages. Standard evaluation relies on Jailbreak Success Rate (JSR), which confounds several safety-driving factors into one, obscuring the specific cause(s) of safety failure. We introduce a latent variable model, a Multi-Group Item Response Theory (IRT) framework, that decouples safety-driving factors such as language-agnostic safety robustness ($θ$), intrinsic prompt hardness ($β$), global language processing difficulty ($γ$), and a prompt-specific cross-lingual safety gap ($τ$). Using the MultiJail dataset, we evaluate the safety robustness of 61 model configurations across 5 closed-model families and 10 languages of varying resource, aggregating a dataset of 1.9 million rows. Exploratory Factor Analysis shows safety is primarily unidimensional: models refuse different harm types mainly through a shared mechanism. Contrary to the expected trend that safety degrades largely in low-resource languages, 22 model configurations are more vulnerable in English than in low-resource languages. Low-resource languages produce more uncertain responses (high entropy) than high-resource languages. Also, high-$τ$ prompts cluster in physical harm categories like Theft and Weapons and lower-resource languages, trends validated through cross-dataset generalization. While global translation quality shows low correlation with $τ$, severe mistranslations drive high-bias outliers, as validated by native speakers. Cultural and conceptual grounding mismatches also contribute to $τ$. In predictive validation, the IRT framework achieves $\mathrm{AUC} = 0.940$, outperforming simpler baselines in predicting safe refusal of unsafe prompts. Our framework reveals concept-language vulnerabilities that aggregate metrics obscure, enabling fairer cross-lingual safety evaluation and targeted improvements in dataset construction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access