Source author record

Matthias Plappert

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
4topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2021arXiv

Asymmetric self-play for automatic goal discovery in robotic manipulation

We train a single, goal-conditioned policy that can solve many robotic manipulation tasks, including tasks with previously unseen goals and objects. We rely on asymmetric self-play for goal discovery, where two agents, Alice and Bob, play a game. Alice is asked to propose challenging goals and Bob aims to solve them. We show that this method can discover highly diverse and complex goals without any human priors. Bob can be trained with only sparse rewards, because the interaction between Alice and Bob results in a natural curriculum and Bob can learn from Alice's trajectory when relabeled as a goal-conditioned demonstration. Finally, our method scales, resulting in a single policy that can generalize to many unseen tasks such as setting a table, stacking blocks, and solving simple puzzles. Videos of a learned policy is available at https://robotics-self-play.github.io.

preprint2016arXiv

Classification of Human Whole-Body Motion using Hidden Markov Models

Human motion plays an important role in many fields. Large databases exist that store and make available recordings of human motions. However, annotating each motion with multiple labels is a cumbersome and error-prone process. This bachelor's thesis presents different approaches to solve the multi-label classification problem using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs). First, different features that can be directly obtained from the raw data are introduced. Next, additional features are derived to improve classification performance. These features are then used to perform the multi-label classification using two different approaches. The first approach simply transforms the multi-label problem into a multi-class problem. The second, novel approach solves the same problem without the need to construct a transformation by predicting the labels directly from the likelihood scores. The second approach scales linearly with the number of labels whereas the first approach is subject to combinatorial explosion. All aspects of the classification process are evaluated on a data set that consists of 454 motions. System 1 achieves an accuracy of 98.02% and system 2 an accuracy of 93.39% on the test set.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.