BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Matthew C. Gombolay

Matthew C. Gombolay appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
ApplicationsHuman-Computer InteractionMachine LearningMethodologyRobotics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Four Years in Review: Statistical Practices of Likert Scales in Human-Robot Interaction Studies

As robots become more prevalent, the importance of the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) grows accordingly. As such, we should endeavor to employ the best statistical practices. Likert scales are commonly used metrics in HRI to measure perceptions and attitudes. Due to misinformation or honest mistakes, most HRI researchers do not adopt best practices when analyzing Likert data. We conduct a review of psychometric literature to determine the current standard for Likert scale design and analysis. Next, we conduct a survey of four years of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2016 through 2019) and report on incorrect statistical practices and design of Likert scales. During these years, only 3 of the 110 papers applied proper statistical testing to correctly-designed Likert scales. Our analysis suggests there are areas for meaningful improvement in the design and testing of Likert scales. Lastly, we provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of conclusions drawn from Likert data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Meta-active Learning in Probabilistically-Safe Optimization

Learning to control a safety-critical system with latent dynamics (e.g. for deep brain stimulation) requires taking calculated risks to gain information as efficiently as possible. To address this problem, we present a probabilistically-safe, meta-active learning approach to efficiently learn system dynamics and optimal configurations. We cast this problem as meta-learning an acquisition function, which is represented by a Long-Short Term Memory Network (LSTM) encoding sampling history. This acquisition function is meta-learned offline to learn high quality sampling strategies. We employ a mixed-integer linear program as our policy with the final, linearized layers of our LSTM acquisition function directly encoded into the objective to trade off expected information gain (e.g., improvement in the accuracy of the model of system dynamics) with the likelihood of safe control. We set a new state-of-the-art in active learning for control of a high-dimensional system with altered dynamics (i.e., a damaged aircraft), achieving a 46% increase in information gain and a 20% speedup in computation time over baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate our system's ability to learn the optimal parameter settings for deep brain stimulation in a rat's brain while avoiding unwanted side effects (i.e., triggering seizures), outperforming prior state-of-the-art approaches with a 58% increase in information gain. Additionally, our algorithm achieves a 97% likelihood of terminating in a safe state while losing only 15% of information gain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access