BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Massimiliano Ignaccolo

Massimiliano Ignaccolo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsphysics.data-anBiological Physicsmath.STphysics.ao-phStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Metastatistics of Extreme Values and its Application in Hydrology

We present a novel statistical treatment, the "metastatistics of extreme events", for calculating the frequency of extreme events. This approach, which is of general validity, is the proper statistical framework to address the problem of data with statistical inhomogeneities. By use of artificial sequences, we show that the metastatistics produce the correct predictions while the traditional approach based on the generalized extreme value distribution does not. An application of the metastatistics methodology to the case of extreme event to rainfall daily precipitation is also presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Phase space parametrization of rain: the inadequacy of the gamma distribution

We show that the Gamma distribution is not an adequate fit for the probability density function of drop diameters using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit test. We propose a different parametrization of drop size distributions, which not depending by any particular functional form, is based on the adoption of standardized central moments. The first three standardized central moments are sufficient to characterize the distribution of drop diamters at the ground. These parameters together with the drop count form a 4-tuple which fully describe the variability of the drop size distributions. The Cartesian product of this 4-tuple of parameters is the rainfall phase space. Using disdrometer data from 10 different locations we identify invariant, not depending on location, properties of the rainfall phenomenon.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Time and ensemble averaging in time series analysis

In many applications expectation values are calculated by partitioning a single experimental time series into an ensemble of data segments of equal length. Such single trajectory ensemble (STE) is a counterpart to a multiple trajectory ensemble (MTE) used whenever independent measurements or realizations of a stochastic process are available. The equivalence of STE and MTE for stationary systems was postulated by Wang and Uhlenbeck in their classic paper on Brownian motion (Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 323 (1945)) but surprisingly has not yet been proved. Using the stationary and ergodic paradigm of statistical physics -- the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) Langevin equation, we revisit Wang and Uhlenbeck's postulate. In particular, we find that the variance of the solution of this equation is different for these two ensembles. While the variance calculated using the MTE quantifies the spreading of independent trajectories originating from the same initial point, the variance for STE measures the spreading of two correlated random walkers. Thus, STE and MTE refer to two completely different dynamical processes. Guided by this interpretation, we introduce a novel algorithm of partitioning a single trajectory into a phenomenological ensemble, which we name a threshold trajectory ensemble (TTE), that for an ergodic system is equivalent to MTE. We find that in the cohort of healthy volunteers, the ratio of STE and TTE asymptotic variances of stage 4 sleep electroencephalogram is equal to 1.96 \pm 0.04 which is in agreement with the theoretically predicted value of 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access