BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Marwan S. Mousa

Marwan S. Mousa contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.app-phcond-mat.mes-hallastro-ph.GAcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.ins-det

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Interpretation of field emission current-voltage data: background theory and detailed simulation testing of a user-friendly webtool

In field electron emission (FE) studies, to interpret current-voltage data and extract characterization parameters, we use smooth planar metal-like emitter (SPME) methodology and a data-analysis plot. Three types exist: Millikan-Lauritsen (ML), Fowler-Nordheim (FN) and Murphy-Good (MG) plots. In SPME methodology, ML and FN plots are slightly curved but a MG plot is nearly straight. 1956 MG FE theory is better physics than 1928 FN theory, so we expect MG plots to be more precise than ML or FN plots. Current-voltage data are often converted: measured voltage to (apparent) macroscopic field, current to macroscopic current density. Thus, four different data-input forms exist. Over-simplified models of system behaviour are widely assumed. Whether simple use of a data-analysis plot is a valid interpretation method is often neglected. Published FE studies seem to contain a high incidence of spurious values for "field enhancement factor". A procedure (the "Orthodoxy Test") described in 2013 allows a validity check: around 40 % of a small sample of results were spuriously high. To assist data interpretation and validity checks, a simple user-friendly webtool has been designed by the lead author. As inputs, this needs system specification data and "range-limits" data from any of the three plot forms, using any of the four data-input forms. The webtool then applies the Orthodoxy Test, and -- if passed -- extracts characterization parameters. This study reports: (1) systematic tests of webtool functionality, using simulated input data prepared using Extended MG FE theory; and (2) systematic comparisons of the three different data-plot types, to check how well extracted parameter values match simulation input values. A summary review of relevant theory is given. For formal emission areas, the MG plot performs better than FN and ML plots. This is important for FE science.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Suggested Alternative to Dark Matter in Galaxies: I. Theoretical Considerations

Dark matter is the generally accepted paradigm in astrophysics and cosmology as a solution to the higher rate of rotation in galaxies, among many other reasons. But since there are still some problems encountered by the standard dark matter paradigm at the galactic scale, we have resorted to an alternative solution, similar to Milgrom's Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). Here, we have assumed that: (i) either the gravitational constant, G, is a function of distance (scale): G = G(r), or, (ii) the gravitational-to-inertial mass ratio, mg/mi, is a function of distance (scale): f(r). We have used a linear approximation of each function, from which two new parameters appeared that have to be determined: G1, the first-order coefficient of gravitational coupling, and C1, the first-order coefficient of gravitational-to-inertial mass ratio. In the current part of this research, we have generated simplified theoretical rotation curves for some hypothetical galaxies by varying the parameters. We have concluded that our model gives a qualitatively and quantitatively acceptable behavior of the galactic rotation curves for some values of these parameters. The values of the 1st-order coefficients that give quantitatively acceptable description of galactic rotation curves are: G1 between around 10^-31 to 10^-30 m^2 s^-2 kg^-1; and, C1 between 10^-21 to 10^-20 m^-1. Furthermore, our model implies the existence of a critical distance at which the MOND effects become significant rather than a critical acceleration. In fact, Milgrom's MOND converges with our model if the critical acceleration is not a constant but a linear function of the galactic baryonic mass.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Applying the field emission orthodoxy test to Murphy-Good plots

In field electron emission (FE) studies, it is important to check and analyse the quality and validity of results experimentally obtained from samples, using suitably plotted current-voltage [I(V)] measurements. For the traditional plotting method, the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plot, there exists a so-called "orthodoxy test" that can be applied to the FN plot, in order to check whether the FE device/system generating the results is "ideal". If it is not ideal, then emitter characterization parameters deduced from the FN plot are likely to be spurious. A new form of FE I(V) data plot, the so-called "Murphy-Good (MG) plot" has recently been introduced (R.G. Forbes, Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 6 (2019) 190912. This aims to improve the precision with which characterization-parameter values (particularly values of formal emission area) can be extracted from FE I(V) data. The present paper compares this new plotting form with the older FN and Millikan-Lauritsen (ML) forms, and makes an independent assessment of the consistency with which slope (and hence scaled-field) estimates can be extracted from a MG plot. It is shown that, by using a revised formula for the extraction of scaled-field values, the existing orthodoxy test can be applied to Murphy-Good plots. The development is reported of a prototype web tool that can apply the orthodoxy test to all three forms of FE data plot (ML, MG and FN).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Implementation of the orthodoxy test as a validity check on experimental field emission data

In field electron emission (FE) studies, it is important to check and analyse the quality and validity of experimental current-voltage data, which is usually plotted in one of a small number of standard forms. These include the so-called Fowler-Nordheim (FN), Millikan-Lauritsen (ML) and Murphy-Good (MG) plots. The Field Emission Orthodoxy Test is a simple quantitative test that aims to check for the reasonableness of the values of the parameter "scaled field" that can be extracted from these plots. This is done in order to establish whether characterization parameters extracted from the plot will be reliable or, alternative, likely to be spurious. This paper summarises the theory behind the orthodoxy test, for each of the plot forms, and confirms that it is easy to apply it to the newly developed MG plot. A simple web tool has been developed that extracts scaled-field values from any of these three plot forms, and tests for lack of field emission orthodoxy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access