BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Martin M. Block

Martin M. Block contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phhep-exhep-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Commentary on "Total Hadronic Cross Section Data and the Froissart-Martin Bound", by Fagundes, Menon and Silva

This Commentary on the paper "Total Hadronic Cross Section Data and the Froissart-Martin Bound", by Fagundes, Menon and Silva, to be published in Braz. J. of Phys., Vol. 42 (2012) (arXiv 1112.4704), was invited by the Editors of the Brazilian Journal of Physics to appear directly after the above authors' printed version, in the same journal issue. We here challenge that paper's conclusions that the Froissart bound was violated. We will show that this conclusion follows from a statistical methodology that we question, and will present compelling supplementary evidence that the latest ultra-high energy experimental $pp$ cross section data are consistent with a $\ln^2 s$ behavior that satisfies the Froissart bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Comment on "Ultrahigh-Energy Neutrino-Nucleon Deep-Inelastic Scattering and the Froissart Bound": Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231802 (2011)

The authors of a recent paper, "Ultrahigh-Energy Neutrino-Nucleon Deep-Inelastic Scattering and the Froissart Bound", A. Illarianov, B. Kniehl and A. Kotikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 231802 (2011), derive an approximate formula for the UHE limit of $σ_{νN}(s)$ in a class of models that includes our own and assert that they are led "to the important observation that $σ_{BBT}^{νN} \propto ln^3s$, which manifestly violates the Froissart bound [2] in contrast to what is stated in Refs. [6-8]", the latter reference being to our work and the $σ_{BBT}^{νN}$ to the cross sections we reported there. We here correct their erroneous implication that $σ_{νN}(s) should satisfy the Froissart bound and their mistaken assertion that we state that $σ_{BBT}^{νN}$ satisfies it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Forward hadronic scattering at 7 TeV: predictions for the LHC; an update

The LHC has successfully run for a long period at half energy, 7 TeV. In this note, we update earlier full-energy Large Hadron Collider (LHC) forward hadronic scattering predictions \cite{physicsreports}, giving new predictions, including errors, for the $pp$ total and inelastic cross sections, the $ρ$-value, the nuclear slope parameter $B$, $dσ_{\rm el}/dt$, and the large gap survival probability at the current 7 TeV energy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Decoupling the coupled DGLAP evolution equations: an analytic solution to pQCD

Using Laplace transform techniques, along with newly-developed accurate numerical inverse Laplace transform algorithms, we decouple the solutions for the singlet structure function $F_s(x,Q^2)$ and $G(x,Q^2)$ of the two leading-order coupled singlet DGLAP equations, allowing us to write fully decoupled solutions: F_s(x,Q^2)={\cal F}_s(F_{s0}(x), G_0(x)), G(x,Q^2)={\cal G}(F_{s0}(x), G_0(x)). Here ${\cal F}_s$ and $\cal G$ are known functions---found using the DGLAP splitting functions---of the functions $F_{s0}(x) \equiv F_s(x,Q_0^2)$ and $G_{0}(x) \equiv G(x,Q_0^2)$, the chosen starting functions at the virtuality $Q_0^2$. As a proof of method, we compare our numerical results from the above equations with the published MSTW LO gluon and singlet $F_s$ distributions, starting from their initial values at $Q_0^2=1 GeV^2$. Our method completely decouples the two LO distributions, at the same time guaranteeing that both distributions satisfy the singlet coupled DGLAP equations. It furnishes us with a new tool for readily obtaining the effects of the starting functions (independently) on the gluon and singlet structure functions, as functions of both $Q^2$ and $Q_0^2$. In addition, it can also be used for non-singlet distributions, thus allowing one to solve analytically for individual quark and gluon distributions values at a given $x$ and $Q^2$, with typical numerical accuracies of about 1 part in $10^5$, rather than having to evolve numerically coupled integral-differential equations on a two-dimensional grid in $x, Q^2$, as is currently done.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

A new numerical method for obtaining gluon distribution functions $G(x,Q^2)=xg(x,Q^2)$, from the proton structure function $F_2^{γp}(x,Q^2)$

An exact expression for the leading-order (LO) gluon distribution function $G(x,Q^2)=xg(x,Q^2)$ from the DGLAP evolution equation for the proton structure function $F_2^{γp}(x,Q^2)$ for deep inelastic $γ^* p$ scattering has recently been obtained [M. M. Block, L. Durand and D. W. McKay, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 79}, 014031, (2009)] for massless quarks, using Laplace transformation techniques. Here, we develop a fast and accurate numerical inverse Laplace transformation algorithm, required to invert the Laplace transforms needed to evaluate $G(x,Q^2)$, and compare it to the exact solution. We obtain accuracies of less than 1 part in 1000 over the entire $x$ and $Q^2$ spectrum. Since no analytic Laplace inversion is possible for next-to-leading order (NLO) and higher orders, this numerical algorithm will enable one to obtain accurate NLO (and NNLO) gluon distributions, using only experimental measurements of $F_2^{γp}(x,Q^2)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Analytic treatment of leading-order parton evolution equations: theory and tests

We recently derived an explicit expression for the gluon distribution function G(x, Q^2) = xg(x, Q^2) in terms of the proton structure function F_2^{γp} (x, Q^2) in leading-order (LO) QCD by solving the the LO DGLAP equation for the Q^2 evolution of F_2^{γp} (x, Q^2) analytically, using a differential-equation method. We re-derive and extend the results here using a Laplace-transform technique, and show that the singlet quark structure function F_S(x,Q^2) can be determined directly in terms of G from the DGLAP gluon evolution equation. To illustrate the method and check the consistency of existing LO quark and gluon distributions, we used the published values of the LO quark distributions from the CTEQ5L and MRST2001LO analyses to form F_2^{γp} (x, Q^2), and then solved analytically for G(x,Q^2). We find that the analytic and fitted gluon distributions from MRST2001LO agree well with each other for all x and Q^2, while those from CTEQ5L differ significantly from each other for large x values, x>~0.03 - 0.05 at all Q^2. We conclude that the published CTEQ5L distributions are incompatible in this region. Using a non-singlet evolution equation, we obtain a sensitive test of quark distributions which holds in both LO and NLO perturbative QCD. We find in either case that the CTEQ5 quark distributions satisfy the tests numerically for small x, but fail the tests for x>~0.03 - 0.05 - their use could potentially lead to significant shifts in predictions of quantities sensitive to large x. We encountered no problems with the MRST2001LO distributions or later CTEQ distributions. We suggest caution in the use of the CTEQ5 distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Analytic derivation of the leading-order gluon distribution function G(x,Q^2) = xg(x,Q^2) from the proton structure function F_2^p(x,Q^2)

We derive a second-order linear differential equation for the leading order gluon distribution function G(x,Q^2) = xg(x,Q^2) which determines G(x,Q^2) directly from the proton structure function F_2^p(x,Q^2). This equation is derived from the leading order DGLAP evolution equation for F_2^p(x,Q^2), and does not require knowledge of either the individual quark distributions or the gluon evolution equation. Given an analytic expression that successfully reproduces the known experimental data for F_2^p(x,Q^2) in a domain x_min<=x<=x_max, Q_min^2<=Q^2<=Q_max^2 of the Bjorken variable x and the virtuality Q^2 in deep inelastic scattering, G(x,Q^2) is uniquely determined in the same domain. We give the general solution and illustrate the method using the recently proposed Froissart bound type parametrization of F_2^p(x,Q^2) of E. L. Berger, M. M. Block and C-I. Tan, PRL 98, 242001, (2007). Existing leading-order gluon distributions based on power-law description of individual parton distributions agree roughly with the new distributions for x>~10^-3 as they should, but are much larger for x<~10^-3.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access