Paper detail

Implications of a Froissart bound saturation of $γ^*$-$p$ deep inelastic scattering. Part I. Quark distributions at ultra small $x$

We argue that the deep inelastic structure function $F_2^{γp}(x, Q^2)$, regarded as a cross section for virtual $γ^*p$ scattering, is hadronic in nature. This implies that its growth is limited by the Froissart bound at high hadronic energies, giving a $\ln^2 (1/x)$ bound on $F_2^{γp}$ as Bjorken $x\rightarrow 0$. The same bound holds for the individual quark distributions. In earlier work, we obtained a very accurate global fit to the combined HERA data on $F_2^{γp}$ using a fit function which respects the Froissart bound at small $x$, and is equivalent in its $x$ dependence to the function used successfully to describe all high energy hadronic cross sections, including $γp$ scattering. We extrapolate that fit by a factor of $\lesssim$3 beyond the HERA region in the natural variable $\ln(1/x)$ to the values of $x$ down to $x=10^{-14}$ and use the results to derive the quark distributions needed for the reliable calculation of neutrino cross sections at energies up to $E_ν=10^{17}$ GeV. These distributions do not satisfy the Feynman "wee parton" assumption, that they all converge toward a common distribution $xq(x,Q^2)$ at small $x$ and large $Q^2$. This was used in some past calculations to express the dominant neutrino structure function $F_2^{ν(\barν)}$ directly in terms of $F_2^{γp}$. We show that the correct distributions nevertheless give results for $F_2^{ν(\barν)}$ which differ only slightly from those obtained assuming that the wee parton limit holds. In two Appendices, we develop simple analytic results for the effects of QCD evolution and operator-product corrections on the distribution functions at small $x$, and show that these effects amount mainly to shifting the values of $\ln(1/x)$ in the initial distributions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.