Paper detail

Implications of a Froissart bound saturation of $γ^*$-$p$ deep inelastic scattering. Part II. Ultra-high energy neutrino interactions

In Part I (in this journal) we argued that the structure function $F_2^{γp}(x,Q^2)$ in deep inelastic $ep$ scattering, regarded as a cross section for virtual $γ^*p$ scattering, has a saturated Froissart-bounded form behaving as $\ln^2 (1/x)$ at small $x$. This form provides an excellent fit to the low $x$ HERA data, including the very low $Q^2$ regions, and can be extrapolated reliably to small $x$ using the natural variable $\ln(1/x)$. We used our fit to derive quark distributions for values of $x$ down to $x=10^{-14}$. We use those distributions here to evaluate ultra-high energy (UHE) cross sections for neutrino scattering on an isoscalar nucleon, $N=(n+p)/2$, up to laboratory neutrino energies $E_ν\sim 10^{16}$-$10^{17}$ GeV where there are now limits on neutrino fluxes. We estimate that these cross sections are accurate to $\sim$2% at the highest energies considered, with the major uncertainty coming from the errors in the parameters that were needed to fit $F_2^{γp}(x,Q^2)$. We compare our results to recently published neutrino cross sections derived from NLO parton distribution functions, which become much larger at high energies because of the use of power-law extrapolations of quark distributions to small $x$. We argue that our calculation of the UHE $νN$ cross sections is the best one can make based the existing experimental deep inelastic scattering data. Further, we show that the strong interaction Froissart bound of $\ln^2 (1/x)$ on $F_2^{γp}$ translates to an exact bound of $\ln^3E_ν$ for leading-order-weak $νN$ scattering. The energy dependence of $νN$ total cross section measurements consequently has important implications for hadronic interactions at enormous cms (center-of-mass) energies not otherwise accessible.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.