BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Markus Pauly

Markus Pauly appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodologymath.STStatistics TheoryApplicationsMachine LearningArtificial Intelligencecs.CYComputationstat.OT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

27works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

27 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Choosing a Model, Shaping a Future: Comparing LLM Perspectives on Sustainability and its Relationship with AI

As organizations increasingly rely on AI systems for decision support in sustainability contexts, it becomes critical to understand the inherent biases and perspectives embedded in Large Language Models (LLMs). This study systematically investigates how five state-of-the-art LLMs -- Claude, DeepSeek, GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral - conceptualize sustainability and its relationship with AI. We administered validated, psychometric sustainability-related questionnaires - each 100 times per model -- to capture response patterns and variability. Our findings revealed significant inter-model differences: For example, GPT exhibited skepticism about the compatibility of AI and sustainability, whereas LLaMA demonstrated extreme techno-optimism with perfect scores for several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Models also diverged in attributing institutional responsibility for AI and sustainability integration, a results that holds implications for technology governance approaches. Our results demonstrate that model selection could substantially influence organizational sustainability strategies, highlighting the need for awareness of model-specific biases when deploying LLMs for sustainability-related decision-making.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

The impact of neglected confounding and interactions in mixed-effects meta-regression

Analysts seldom include interaction terms in meta-regression model, what can introduce bias if an interaction is present. We illustrate this in the current paper by re-analyzing an example from research on acute heart failure, where neglecting an interaction might have led to erroneous inference and conclusions. Moreover, we perform a brief simulation study based on this example highlighting the effects caused by omitting or unnecessarily including interaction terms. Based on our results, we recommend to always include interaction terms in mixed-effects meta-regression models, when such interactions are plausible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cluster-Robust Estimators for Bivariate Mixed-Effects Meta-Regression

Meta-analyses frequently include trials that report multiple effect sizes based on a common set of study participants. These effect sizes will generally be correlated. Cluster-robust variance-covariance estimators are a fruitful approach for synthesizing dependent effects. However, when the number of studies is small, state-of-the-art robust estimators can yield inflated Type 1 errors. We present two new cluster-robust estimators, in order to improve small sample performance. For both new estimators the idea is to transform the estimated variances of the residuals using only the diagonal entries of the hat matrix. Our proposals are asymptotically equivalent to previously suggested cluster-robust estimators such as the bias reduced linearization approach. We apply the methods to real world data and compare and contrast their performance in an extensive simulation study. We focus on bivariate meta-regression, although the approaches can be applied more generally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Estimating Gaussian Copulas with Missing Data

In this work we present a rigorous application of the Expectation Maximization algorithm to determine the marginal distributions and the dependence structure in a Gaussian copula model with missing data. We further show how to circumvent a priori assumptions on the marginals with semiparametric modelling. The joint distribution learned through this algorithm is considerably closer to the underlying distribution than existing methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Inference for high-dimensional split-plot designs with different dimensions between groups

In repeated Measure Designs with multiple groups, the primary purpose is to compare different groups in various aspects. For several reasons, the number of measurements and therefore the dimension of the observation vectors can depend on the group, making the usage of existing approaches impossible. We develop an approach which can be used not only for a possibly increasing number of groups $a$, but also for group-depending dimension $d_i$, which is allowed to go to infinity. This is a unique high-dimensional asymptotic framework impressing through its variety and do without usual conditions on the relation between sample size and dimension. It especially includes settings with fixed dimensions in some groups and increasing dimensions in other ones, which can be seen as semi-high-dimensional. To find a appropriate statistic test new and innovative estimators are developed, which can be used under these diverse settings on $a,d_i$ and $n_i$ without any adjustments. We investigated the asymptotic distribution of a quadratic-form-based test statistic and developed an asymptotic correct test. Finally, an extensive simulation study is conducted to investigate the role of the single group's dimension.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Machine Learning for Multi-Output Regression: When should a holistic multivariate approach be preferred over separate univariate ones?

Tree-based ensembles such as the Random Forest are modern classics among statistical learning methods. In particular, they are used for predicting univariate responses. In case of multiple outputs the question arises whether we separately fit univariate models or directly follow a multivariate approach. For the latter, several possibilities exist that are, e.g. based on modified splitting or stopping rules for multi-output regression. In this work we compare these methods in extensive simulations to help in answering the primary question when to use multivariate ensemble techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the role of data, statistics and decisions in a pandemic

A pandemic poses particular challenges to decision-making because of the need to continuously adapt decisions to rapidly changing evidence and available data. For example, which countermeasures are appropriate at a particular stage of the pandemic? How can the severity of the pandemic be measured? What is the effect of vaccination in the population and which groups should be vaccinated first? The process of decision-making starts with data collection and modeling and continues to the dissemination of results and the subsequent decisions taken. The goal of this paper is to give an overview of this process and to provide recommendations for the different steps from a statistical perspective. In particular, we discuss a range of modeling techniques including mathematical, statistical and decision-analytic models along with their applications in the COVID-19 context. With this overview, we aim to foster the understanding of the goals of these modeling approaches and the specific data requirements that are essential for the interpretation of results and for successful interdisciplinary collaborations. A special focus is on the role played by data in these different models, and we incorporate into the discussion the importance of statistical literacy, and of effective dissemination and communication of findings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem in small samples

While there appears to be a general consensus in the literature on the definition of the estimand and estimator associated with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, it seems somewhat less clear as to how best to estimate the variance. In addition to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, we review different proposals of variance estimators consistent under both the null hypothesis and the alternative. Moreover, in case of small sample sizes, an approximation of the distribution of the test statistic based on the t-distribution, a logit transformation and a permutation approach have been proposed. Focussing as well on different estimators of the degrees of freedom as regards the t-approximation, we carried out simulations for a range of scenarios, with results indicating that the performance of different variance estimators in terms of controlling the type I error rate largely depends on the heteroskedasticity pattern and the sample size allocation ratio, not on the specific type of distributions employed. By and large, a particular t-approximation together with Perme and Manevski's variance estimator best maintains the nominal significance level

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Goodness (of fit) of Imputation Accuracy: The GoodImpact Analysis

In statistical survey analysis, (partial) non-responders are integral elements during data acquisition. Treating missing values during data preparation and data analysis is therefore a non-trivial underpinning. Focusing on different data sets from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (DESTATIS), we investigate various imputation methods regarding their imputation accuracy. Since the latter is not uniquely determined in theory and practice, we study different measures for assessing imputation accuracy: Beyond the most common measures, the normalized-root mean squared error (NRMSE) and the proportion of false classification (PFC), we put a special focus on (distribution) distance- and association measures for assessing imputation accuracy. The aim is to deliver guidelines for correctly assessing distributional accuracy after imputation. Our empirical findings indicate a discrepancy between the NRMSE resp. PFC and distance measures. While the latter measure distributional similarities, NRMSE and PFC focus on data reproducibility. We realize that a low NRMSE or PFC seem not to imply lower distributional discrepancies. Although several measures for assessing distributional discrepancies exist, our results indicate that not all of them are suitable for evaluating imputation-induced differences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the Relation between Prediction and Imputation Accuracy under Missing Covariates

Missing covariates in regression or classification problems can prohibit the direct use of advanced tools for further analysis. Recent research has realized an increasing trend towards the usage of modern Machine Learning algorithms for imputation. It originates from their capability of showing favourable prediction accuracy in different learning problems. In this work, we analyze through simulation the interaction between imputation accuracy and prediction accuracy in regression learning problems with missing covariates when Machine Learning based methods for both, imputation and prediction are used. In addition, we explore imputation performance when using statistical inference procedures in prediction settings, such as coverage rates of (valid) prediction intervals. Our analysis is based on empirical datasets provided by the UCI Machine Learning repository and an extensive simulation study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fisher transformation based Confidence Intervals of Correlations in Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

Meta-analyses of correlation coefficients are an important technique to integrate results from many cross-sectional and longitudinal research designs. Uncertainty in pooled estimates is typically assessed with the help of confidence intervals, which can double as hypothesis tests for two-sided hypotheses about the underlying correlation. A standard approach to construct confidence intervals for the main effect is the Hedges-Olkin-Vevea Fisher-z (HOVz) approach, which is based on the Fisher-z transformation. Results from previous studies (Field, 2005; Hafdahl and Williams, 2009), however, indicate that in random-effects models the performance of the HOVz confidence interval can be unsatisfactory. To this end, we propose improvements of the HOVz approach, which are based on enhanced variance estimators for the main effect estimate. In order to study the coverage of the new confidence intervals in both fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis models, we perform an extensive simulation study, comparing them to established approaches. Data were generated via a truncated normal and beta distribution model. The results show that our newly proposed confidence intervals based on a Knapp-Hartung-type variance estimator or robust heteroscedasticity consistent sandwich estimators in combination with the integral z-to-r transformation (Hafdahl, 2009) provide more accurate coverage than existing approaches in most scenarios, especially in the more appropriate beta distribution simulation model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Inferring median survival differences in general factorial designs via permutation tests

Factorial survival designs with right-censored observations are commonly inferred by Cox regression and explained by means of hazard ratios. However, in case of non-proportional hazards, their interpretation can become cumbersome; especially for clinicians. We therefore offer an alternative: median survival times are used to estimate treatment and interaction effects and null hypotheses are formulated in contrasts of their population versions. Permutation-based tests and confidence regions are proposed and shown to be asymptotically valid. Their type-1 error control and power behavior are investigated in extensive simulations, showing the new methods' wide applicability. The latter is complemented by an illustrative data analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Is there a role for statistics in artificial intelligence?

The research on and application of artificial intelligence (AI) has triggered a comprehensive scientific, economic, social and political discussion. Here we argue that statistics, as an interdisciplinary scientific field, plays a substantial role both for the theoretical and practical understanding of AI and for its future development. Statistics might even be considered a core element of AI. With its specialist knowledge of data evaluation, starting with the precise formulation of the research question and passing through a study design stage on to analysis and interpretation of the results, statistics is a natural partner for other disciplines in teaching, research and practice. This paper aims at contributing to the current discussion by highlighting the relevance of statistical methodology in the context of AI development. In particular, we discuss contributions of statistics to the field of artificial intelligence concerning methodological development, planning and design of studies, assessment of data quality and data collection, differentiation of causality and associations and assessment of uncertainty in results. Moreover, the paper also deals with the equally necessary and meaningful extension of curricula in schools and universities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Permutation inference in factorial survival designs with the CASANOVA

We propose inference procedures for general nonparametric factorial survival designs with possibly right-censored data. Similar to additive Aalen models, null hypotheses are formulated in terms of cumulative hazards. Thereby, deviations are measured in terms of quadratic forms in Nelson-Aalen-type integrals. Different to existing approaches this allows to work without restrictive model assumptions as proportional hazards. In particular, crossing survival or hazard curves can be detected without a significant loss of power. For a distribution-free application of the method, a permutation strategy is suggested. The resulting procedures' asymptotic validity as well as their consistency are proven and their small sample performances are analyzed in extensive simulations. Their applicability is finally illustrated by analyzing an oncology data set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

QANOVA: Quantile-based Permutation Methods For General Factorial Designs

Population means and standard deviations are the most common estimands to quantify effects in factorial layouts. In fact, most statistical procedures in such designs are built towards inferring means or contrasts thereof. For more robust analyses, we consider the population median, the interquartile range (IQR) and more general quantile combinations as estimands in which we formulate null hypotheses and calculate compatible confidence regions. Based upon simultaneous multivariate central limit theorems and corresponding resampling results, we derive asymptotically correct procedures in general, potentially heteroscedastic, factorial designs with univariate endpoints. Special cases cover robust tests for the population median or the IQR in arbitrary crossed one-, two- and higher-way layouts with potentially heteroscedastic error distributions. In extensive simulations we analyze their small sample properties and also conduct an illustrating data analysis comparing children's height and weight from different countries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Small-sample performance and underlying assumptions of a bootstrap-based inference method for a general analysis of covariance model with possibly heteroskedastic and nonnormal errors

It is well known that the standard F test is severely affected by heteroskedasticity in unbalanced analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. Currently available potential remedies for such a scenario are based on heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimation (HCCME). However, the HCCME approach tends to be liberal in small samples. Therefore, in the present manuscript, we propose a combination of HCCME and a wild bootstrap technique, with the aim of improving the small-sample performance. We precisely state a set of assumptions for the general ANCOVA model and discuss their practical interpretation in detail, since this issue may have been somewhat neglected in applied research so far. We prove that these assumptions are sufficient to ensure the asymptotic validity of the combined HCCME-wild bootstrap ANCOVA. The results of our simulation study indicate that our proposed test remedies the problems of the ANCOVA F test and its heteroskedasticity-consistent alternatives in small to moderate sample size scenarios. Our test only requires very mild conditions, thus being applicable in a broad range of real-life settings, as illustrated by the detailed discussion of a dataset from preclinical research on spinal cord injury. Our proposed method is ready-to-use and allows for valid hypothesis testing in frequently encountered settings (e.g., comparing group means while adjusting for baseline measurements in a randomized controlled clinical trial).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Multivariate analysis of covariance when standard assumptions are violated

In applied research, it is often sensible to account for one or several covariates when testing for differences between multivariate means of several groups. However, the "classical" parametric multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) tests (e.g., Wilks' Lambda) are based on quite restrictive assumptions (homoscedasticity and normality of the errors), which might be difficult to justify in small sample size settings. Furthermore, existing potential remedies (e.g., heteroskedasticity-robust approaches) become inappropriate in cases where the covariance matrices are singular. Nevertheless, such scenarios are frequently encountered in the life sciences and other fields, when for example, in the context of standardized assessments, a summary performance measure as well as its corresponding subscales are analyzed. In the present manuscript, we consider a general MANCOVA model, allowing for potentially heteroskedastic and even singular covariance matrices as well as non-normal errors. We combine heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimation methods with our proposed modified MANCOVA ANOVA-type statistic (MANCATS) and apply two different bootstrap approaches. We provide the proofs of the asymptotic validity of the respective testing procedures as well as the results from an extensive simulation study, which indicate that especially the parametric bootstrap version of the MANCATS outperforms its competitors in most scenarios, both in terms of type I error rates and power. These considerations are further illustrated and substantiated by examining real-life data from standardized achievement tests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Inference for the Mann-Whitney Effect for Right-Censored and Tied Data

The Mann-Whitney effect is an intuitive measure for discriminating two survival distributions. Here we analyze various inference techniques for this parameter in a two-sample survival setting with independent right-censoring, where the survival times are even allowed to be discretely distributed. This allows for ties in the data and requires the introduction of normalized versions of Kaplan-Meier estimators from which adequate point estimates are deduced. From an asymptotic analysis of the latter, asymptotically exact inference procedures based on standard normal, bootstrap- and permutation-quantiles are developed and compared in simulations. Here, the asymptotically robust and, in case of equal survival and censoring distributions, even finitely exact permutation procedure turned out to be the best. Finally, all procedures are illustrated using a real data set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Permuting Incomplete Paired Data: A Novel Exact and Asymptotic Correct Randomization Test

Various statistical tests have been developed for testing the equality of means in matched pairs with missing values. However, most existing methods are commonly based on certain distributional assumptions such as normality, 0-symmetry or homoscedasticity of the data. The aim of this paper is to develop a statistical test that is robust against deviations from such assumptions and also leads to valid inference in case of heteroscedasticity or skewed distributions. This is achieved by applying a novel randomization approach. The resulting test procedure is not only shown to be asymptotically correct but is also finitely exact if the distribution of the data is invariant with respect to the considered randomization group. Its small sample performance is further studied in an extensive simulation study and compared to existing methods. Finally, an illustrative data example is analyzed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Permuting longitudinal data despite all the dependencies

For general repeated measures designs the Wald-type statistic (WTS) is an asymptotically valid procedure allowing for unequal covariance matrices and possibly non-normal multivariate observations. The drawback of this procedure is the poor performance for small to moderate samples, i.e. decisions based on the WTS may become quite liberal. It is the aim of the present paper to improve its small sample behavior by means of a novel permutation procedure. In particular, it is shown that a permutation version of the WTS inherits its good large sample properties while yielding a very accurate finite sample control of the type-I error as shown in extensive simulations. Moreover, the new permutation method is motivated by a practical data set of a split plot design with a factorial structure on the repeated measures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Rank-Based Procedures in Factorial Designs: Hypotheses about Nonparametric Treatment Effects

Existing tests for factorial designs in the nonparametric case are based on hypotheses formulated in terms of distribution functions. Typical null hypotheses, however, are formulated in terms of some parameters or effect measures, particularly in heteroscedastic settings. Here this idea is extended to nonparametric models by introducing a novel nonparametric ANOVA-type-statistic based on ranks which is suitable for testing hypotheses formulated in meaningful nonparametric treatment effects in general factorial designs. This is achieved by a careful in-depth study of the common distribution of rank-based estimators for the treatment effects. Since the statistic is asymptotically not a pivotal quantity we propose three different approximation techniques, discuss their theoretic properties and compare them in extensive simulations together with two additionalWald-type tests. An extension of the presented idea to general repeated measures designs is briefly outlined. The proposed rank-based procedures maintain the pre-assigned type-I error rate quite accurately, also in unbalanced and heteroscedastic models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Using EEG, SPECT, and Multivariate Resampling Methods to Differentiate Between Alzheimer's and other Cognitive Impairments

The incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other forms of dementia is increasing in most western countries. For a precise and early diagnosis, several examination modalities exist, among them single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and the electroencephalogram (EEG). The latter is highly available, free of radiation hazards, and non-invasive. Thus, its diagnostic utility regarding different stages of dementia is of great interest in neurological research, along with the question of whether its utility depends on age or sex of the person being examined. However, SPECT or EEG measurements are intrinsically multivariate, and there has been a shortage of sufficiently general inferential techniques for the analysis of multivariate data in factorial designs when neither multivariate normality nor equality of covariance matrices across groups should be assumed. We adapt an asymptotic model based (parametric) bootstrap approach to this situation, demonstrate its ability, and use it for a truly multivariate analysis of the EEG and SPECT measurements, taking into account demographic factors such as age and sex. These multivariate results are supplemented by marginal effects bootstrap inference whose theoretical properties can be derived analogously to the multivariate methods. Both inference approaches can have advantages in particular situations, as illustrated in the data analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Approximative Tests for the Equality of Two Cumulative Incidence Functions of a Competing Risk

In the context of the widely used competing risks set-up we discuss different inference procedures for testing equality of two cumulative incidence functions, where the data may be subject to independent right-censoring or left-truncation. To this end we compare two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov- and Cramer-von Mises-type test statistics. Since, in general, their corresponding asymptotic limit distributions depend on unknown quantities, we utilize wild bootstrap resampling as well as approximation techniques to construct adequate test decisions. Here the latter procedures are motivated from testing procedures for heteroscedastic factorial designs but have not yet been proposed in the survival context. A simulation study shows the performance of all considered tests under various settings and finally a real data example about bloodstream infection during neutropenia is used to illustrate their application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

M-Functionals of Multivariate Scatter

This survey provides a self-contained account of $M$-estimation of multivariate scatter. In particular, we present new proofs for existence of the underlying $M$-functionals and discuss their weak continuity and differentiability. This is done in a rather general framework with matrix-valued random variables. By doing so we reveal a connection between Tyler's (1987) $M$-functional of scatter and the estimation of proportional covariance matrices. Moreover, this general framework allows us to treat a new class of scatter estimators, based on symmetrizations of arbitrary order. Finally these results are applied to $M$-estimation of multivariate location and scatter via multivariate $t$-distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Non-strange Weird Resampling for Complex Survival Data

This paper introduces the new data-dependent multiplier bootstrap for non-parametric analysis of survival data, possibly subject to competing risks. The new resampling procedure includes both the general wild bootstrap and the weird bootstrap as special cases. The data may be subject to independent right-censoring and left-truncation. We rigorously prove asymptotic correctness which has in particular been pending for the weird bootstrap. As a consequence, pointwise as well as time-simultaneous inference procedures for, amongst others, the classical survival setting are deduced. We report simulation results and a real data analysis of the cumulative cardiovascular event probability. The simulation results suggest that both the weird bootstrap and use of non-standard multipliers in the wild bootstrap may perform preferably.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Testing equality of spectral densities using randomization techniques

In this paper, we investigate the testing problem that the spectral density matrices of several, not necessarily independent, stationary processes are equal. Based on an $L_2$-type test statistic, we propose a new nonparametric approach, where the critical values of the tests are calculated with the help of randomization methods. We analyze asymptotic exactness and consistency of these randomization tests and show in simulation studies that the new procedures posses very good size and power characteristics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

How to Bootstrap Aalen-Johansen Processes for Competing Risks? Handicaps, Solutions and Limitations

Statistical inference in competing risks models is often based on the famous Aalen-Johansen estimator. Since the corresponding limit process lacks independent increments, it is typically applied together with Lin's (1997) resampling technique involving standard normal multipliers. Recently, it has been seen that this approach can be interpreted as a wild bootstrap technique and that other multipliers, as e.g. centered Poissons, may lead to better finite sample performances, see Beyersmann et al. (2013). Since the latter is closely related to Efron's classical bootstrap, the question arises whether this or more general weighted bootstrap versions of Aalen-Johansen processes lead to valid results. Here we analyze their asymptotic behaviour and it turns out that such weighted bootstrap versions in general possess the wrong covariance structure in the limit. However, we explain that the weighted bootstrap can nevertheless be applied for specific null hypotheses of interest and also discuss its limitations for statistical inference. To this end, we introduce different consistent weighted bootstrap tests for the null hypothesis of stochastically ordered cumulative incidence functions and compare their finite sample performance in a simulation study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access