BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Mark Siggers

Mark Siggers appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

On the representation of finite distributive lattices

A simple but elegant result of Rival states that every sublattice $L$ of a finite distributive lattice $\mathcal{P}$ can be constructed from $\mathcal{P}$ by removing a particular family $\mathcal{I}_L$ of its irreducible intervals. Applying this in the case that $\mathcal{P}$ is a product of a finite set $\mathcal{C}$ of chains, we get a one-to-one correspondence $L \mapsto \mathcal{D}_\mathcal{P}(L)$ between the sublattices of $\mathcal{P}$ and the preorders spanned by a canonical sublattice $\mathcal{C}^\infty$ of $\mathcal{P}$. We then show that $L$ is a tight sublattice of the product of chains $\mathcal{P}$ if and only if $\mathcal{D}_\mathcal{P}(L)$ is asymmetric. This yields a one-to-one correspondence between the tight sublattices of $\mathcal{P}$ and the posets spanned by its poset $J(\mathcal{P})$ of non-zero join-irreducible elements. With this we recover and extend, among other classical results, the correspondence derived from results of Birkhoff and Dilworth, between the tight embeddings of a finite distributive lattice $L$ into products of chains, and the chain decompositions of its poset $J(L)$ of non-zero join-irreducible elements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Towards extending the Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem to cross t-intersecting families

Ahlswede and Khachatrian's diametric theorem is a weighted version of their complete intersection theorem, itself an extension of the $t$-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem. Their intersection theorem says that the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$, every pair of which intersects in at least $t$ elements, is the size of certain trivially intersecting families proposed by Frankl. We address a cross intersecting version of their diametric theorem. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $[n]$ are {\em cross $t$-intersecting} if for every $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$, $A$ and $B$ intersect in at least $t$ elements. The $p$-weight of a $k$ element subset $A$ of $[n]$ is $p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}$, and the weight of a family $\mathcal{A}$ is the sum of the weights of its sets. The weight of a pair of families is the product of the weights of the families. The maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family depends on the value of $p$. Ahlswede and Khachatrian showed that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{r}{t + 2r - 1}, \frac{r+1}{t + 2r + 1}]$, the maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family is that of the family $\mathcal{F}^t_r$ consisting of all subsets of $[n]$ containing at least $t+r$ elements of the set $[t+2r]$. In a previous paper we showed a cross $t$-intersecting version of this for large $t$ in the case that $r = 0$. In this paper, we do the same in the case that $r = 1$. We show that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{1}{t + 1}, \frac{2}{t + 3}]$ the maximum $p$-weight of a cross $t$-intersecting pair of families, for $t \geq 200$, is achieved when both families are $\mathcal{F}^t_1$. Further, we show that except at the endpoints of this range, this is, up to isomorphism, the only pair of $t$-intersecting families achieving this weight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

An Erd\H os--Ko--Rado theorem for cross $t$-intersecting families

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$, of $k$-subsets of an $n$-set, are {\em cross $t$-intersecting} if for every choice of subsets $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$ we have $|A \cap B| \geq t$. We address the following conjectured cross $t$-intersecting version of the Erd\H os--Ko--Rado Theorem: For all $n \geq (t+1)(k-t+1)$ the maximum value of $|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}|$ for two cross $t$-intersecting families $\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} \subset\binom{[n]}{k}$ is $\binom{n-t}{k-t}^2$. We verify this for all $t \geq 14$ except finitely many $n$ and $k$ for each fixed $t$. Further, we prove uniqueness and stability results in these cases, showing, for instance, that the families reaching this bound are unique up to isomorphism. We also consider a {\em $p$-weight} version of the problem, which comes from the product measure on the power set of an $n$-set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access