Paper detail

Towards extending the Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem to cross t-intersecting families

Ahlswede and Khachatrian's diametric theorem is a weighted version of their complete intersection theorem, itself an extension of the $t$-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem. Their intersection theorem says that the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$, every pair of which intersects in at least $t$ elements, is the size of certain trivially intersecting families proposed by Frankl. We address a cross intersecting version of their diametric theorem. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $[n]$ are {\em cross $t$-intersecting} if for every $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$, $A$ and $B$ intersect in at least $t$ elements. The $p$-weight of a $k$ element subset $A$ of $[n]$ is $p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}$, and the weight of a family $\mathcal{A}$ is the sum of the weights of its sets. The weight of a pair of families is the product of the weights of the families. The maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family depends on the value of $p$. Ahlswede and Khachatrian showed that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{r}{t + 2r - 1}, \frac{r+1}{t + 2r + 1}]$, the maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family is that of the family $\mathcal{F}^t_r$ consisting of all subsets of $[n]$ containing at least $t+r$ elements of the set $[t+2r]$. In a previous paper we showed a cross $t$-intersecting version of this for large $t$ in the case that $r = 0$. In this paper, we do the same in the case that $r = 1$. We show that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{1}{t + 1}, \frac{2}{t + 3}]$ the maximum $p$-weight of a cross $t$-intersecting pair of families, for $t \geq 200$, is achieved when both families are $\mathcal{F}^t_1$. Further, we show that except at the endpoints of this range, this is, up to isomorphism, the only pair of $t$-intersecting families achieving this weight.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.