BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Marc Zeitoun

Marc Zeitoun appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryDiscrete MathematicsLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Characterizing level one in group-based concatenation hierarchies

We investigate two operators on classes of regular languages: polynomial closure (Pol) and Boolean closure (Bool). We apply these operators to classes of group languages G and to their well-suited extensions G+, which is the least Boolean algebra containing G and the singleton language containing the empty word. This yields the classes Bool(Pol(G)) and Bool(Pol(G+)). These classes form the first level in important classifications of classes of regular languages, called concatenation hierarchies, which admit natural logical characterizations. We present generic algebraic characterizations of these classes. They imply that one may decide whether a regular language belongs to such a class, provided that a more general problem called separation is decidable for the input class G. The proofs are constructive and rely exclusively on notions from language and automata theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Transfer Theorem for the Separation Problem

We investigate two problems for a class C of regular word languages. The C-membership problem asks for an algorithm to decide whether an input language belongs to C. The C-separation problem asks for an algorithm that, given as input two regular languages, decides whether there exists a third language in C containing the first language, while being disjoint from the second. These problems are considered as means to obtain a deep understanding of the class C. It is usual for such classes to be defined by logical formalisms. Logics are often built on top of each other, by adding new predicates. A natural construction is to enrich a logic with the successor relation. In this paper, we obtain simple self-contained proofs of two transfer results: we show that for suitable logically defined classes, the membership, resp. the separation problem for a class enriched with the successor relation reduces to the same problem for the original class. Our reductions work both for languages of finite words and infinite words. The proofs are mostly self-contained, and only require a basic background on regular languages. This paper therefore gives new, simple proofs of results that were considered as difficult, such as the decid- ability of the membership problem for the levels 1, 3/2, 2 and 5/2 of the dot-depth hierarchy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Quantifier Alternation for Infinite Words

We investigate the expressive power of quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic over words. This hierarchy includes the classes $Σ_i$ (sentences having at most $i$ blocks of quantifiers starting with an $\exists$) and $\mathcal{B}Σ_i$ (Boolean combinations of $Σ_i$ sentences). So far, this expressive power has been effectively characterized for the lower levels only. Recently, a breakthrough was made over finite words, and decidable characterizations were obtained for $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$, by relying on a decision problem called separation, and solving it for $Σ_2$. The contribution of this paper is a generalization of these results to the setting of infinite words: we solve separation for $Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$, and obtain decidable characterizations of $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$ as consequences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Going higher in the First-order Quantifier Alternation Hierarchy on Words

We investigate the quantifier alternation hierarchy in first-order logic on finite words. Levels in this hierarchy are defined by counting the number of quantifier alternations in formulas. We prove that one can decide membership of a regular language to the levels $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ (boolean combination of formulas having only 1 alternation) and $Σ_3$ (formulas having only 2 alternations beginning with an existential block). Our proof works by considering a deeper problem, called separation, which, once solved for lower levels, allows us to solve membership for higher levels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Separation by Locally Testable and Locally Threshold Testable Languages

A separator for two languages is a third language containing the first one and disjoint from the second one. We investigate the following decision problem: given two regular input languages, decide whether there exists a locally testable (resp. a locally threshold testable) separator. In both cases, we design a decision procedure based on the occurrence of special patterns in automata accepting the input languages. We prove that the problem is computationally harder than deciding membership. The correctness proof of the algorithm yields a stronger result, namely a description of a possible separator. Finally, we discuss the same problem for context-free input languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Separating regular languages by piecewise testable and unambiguous languages

Separation is a classical problem asking whether, given two sets belonging to some class, it is possible to separate them by a set from a smaller class. We discuss the separation problem for regular languages. We give a Ptime algorithm to check whether two given regular languages are separable by a piecewise testable language, that is, whether a $BΣ1(<)$ sentence can witness that the languages are disjoint. The proof refines an algebraic argument from Almeida and the third author. When separation is possible, we also express a separator by saturating one of the original languages by a suitable congruence. Following the same line, we show that one can as well decide whether two regular languages can be separated by an unambiguous language, albeit with a higher complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The separation problem for regular languages by piecewise testable languages

Separation is a classical problem in mathematics and computer science. It asks whether, given two sets belonging to some class, it is possible to separate them by another set of a smaller class. We present and discuss the separation problem for regular languages. We then give a direct polynomial time algorithm to check whether two given regular languages are separable by a piecewise testable language, that is, whether a $BΣ1(<)$ sentence can witness that the languages are indeed disjoint. The proof is a reformulation and a refinement of an algebraic argument already given by Almeida and the second author.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Model Checking Vector Addition Systems with one zero-test

We design a variation of the Karp-Miller algorithm to compute, in a forward manner, a finite representation of the cover (i.e., the downward closure of the reachability set) of a vector addition system with one zero-test. This algorithm yields decision procedures for several problems for these systems, open until now, such as place-boundedness or LTL model-checking. The proof techniques to handle the zero-test are based on two new notions of cover: the refined and the filtered cover. The refined cover is a hybrid between the reachability set and the classical cover. It inherits properties of the reachability set: equality of two refined covers is undecidable, even for usual Vector Addition Systems (with no zero-test), but the refined cover of a Vector Addition System is a recursive set. The second notion of cover, called the filtered cover, is the central tool of our algorithms. It inherits properties of the classical cover, and in particular, one can effectively compute a finite representation of this set, even for Vector Addition Systems with one zero-test.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access