Source author record

Thomas Place

Thomas Place appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Formal Languages and Automata Theory Logic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Characterizing level one in group-based concatenation hierarchies

We investigate two operators on classes of regular languages: polynomial closure (Pol) and Boolean closure (Bool). We apply these operators to classes of group languages G and to their well-suited extensions G+, which is the least Boolean algebra containing G and the singleton language containing the empty word. This yields the classes Bool(Pol(G)) and Bool(Pol(G+)). These classes form the first level in important classifications of classes of regular languages, called concatenation hierarchies, which admit natural logical characterizations. We present generic algebraic characterizations of these classes. They imply that one may decide whether a regular language belongs to such a class, provided that a more general problem called separation is decidable for the input class G. The proofs are constructive and rely exclusively on notions from language and automata theory.

preprint2022arXiv

The amazing mixed polynomial closure and its applications to two-variable first-order logic

Polynomial closure is a standard operator which is applied to a class of regular languages. In the paper, we investigate three restrictions called left (LPol), right (RPol) and mixed polynomial closure (MPol). The first two were known while MPol is new. We look at two decision problems that are defined for every class C. Membership takes a regular language as input and asks if it belongs to C. Separation takes two regular languages as input and asks if there exists a third language in C including the first one and disjoint from the second. We prove that LPol, RPol and MPol preserve the decidability of membership under mild hypotheses on the input class, and the decidability of separation under much stronger hypotheses. We apply these results to natural hierarchies. First, we look at several language theoretic hierarchies that are built by applying LPol, RPol and MPol recursively to a single input class. We prove that these hierarchies can actually be defined using almost exclusively MPol. We also consider quantifier alternation hierarchies for two-variable first-order logic and prove that one can climb them using MPol. The result is generic in the sense that it holds for most standard choices of signatures. We use it to prove that for most of these choices, membership is decidable for all levels in the hierarchy. Finally, we prove that separation is decidable for the hierarchy of two-variable first-order logic equipped with only the linear order.

preprint2015arXiv

A Transfer Theorem for the Separation Problem

We investigate two problems for a class C of regular word languages. The C-membership problem asks for an algorithm to decide whether an input language belongs to C. The C-separation problem asks for an algorithm that, given as input two regular languages, decides whether there exists a third language in C containing the first language, while being disjoint from the second. These problems are considered as means to obtain a deep understanding of the class C. It is usual for such classes to be defined by logical formalisms. Logics are often built on top of each other, by adding new predicates. A natural construction is to enrich a logic with the successor relation. In this paper, we obtain simple self-contained proofs of two transfer results: we show that for suitable logically defined classes, the membership, resp. the separation problem for a class enriched with the successor relation reduces to the same problem for the original class. Our reductions work both for languages of finite words and infinite words. The proofs are mostly self-contained, and only require a basic background on regular languages. This paper therefore gives new, simple proofs of results that were considered as difficult, such as the decid- ability of the membership problem for the levels 1, 3/2, 2 and 5/2 of the dot-depth hierarchy.

preprint2015arXiv

Quantifier Alternation for Infinite Words

We investigate the expressive power of quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic over words. This hierarchy includes the classes $Σ_i$ (sentences having at most $i$ blocks of quantifiers starting with an $\exists$) and $\mathcal{B}Σ_i$ (Boolean combinations of $Σ_i$ sentences). So far, this expressive power has been effectively characterized for the lower levels only. Recently, a breakthrough was made over finite words, and decidable characterizations were obtained for $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$, by relying on a decision problem called separation, and solving it for $Σ_2$. The contribution of this paper is a generalization of these results to the setting of infinite words: we solve separation for $Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$, and obtain decidable characterizations of $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ and $Σ_3$ as consequences.

preprint2014arXiv

Going higher in the First-order Quantifier Alternation Hierarchy on Words

We investigate the quantifier alternation hierarchy in first-order logic on finite words. Levels in this hierarchy are defined by counting the number of quantifier alternations in formulas. We prove that one can decide membership of a regular language to the levels $\mathcal{B}Σ_2$ (boolean combination of formulas having only 1 alternation) and $Σ_3$ (formulas having only 2 alternations beginning with an existential block). Our proof works by considering a deeper problem, called separation, which, once solved for lower levels, allows us to solve membership for higher levels.

preprint2014arXiv

On Separation by Locally Testable and Locally Threshold Testable Languages

A separator for two languages is a third language containing the first one and disjoint from the second one. We investigate the following decision problem: given two regular input languages, decide whether there exists a locally testable (resp. a locally threshold testable) separator. In both cases, we design a decision procedure based on the occurrence of special patterns in automata accepting the input languages. We prove that the problem is computationally harder than deciding membership. The correctness proof of the algorithm yields a stronger result, namely a description of a possible separator. Finally, we discuss the same problem for context-free input languages.

preprint2013arXiv

Separating regular languages by piecewise testable and unambiguous languages

Separation is a classical problem asking whether, given two sets belonging to some class, it is possible to separate them by a set from a smaller class. We discuss the separation problem for regular languages. We give a Ptime algorithm to check whether two given regular languages are separable by a piecewise testable language, that is, whether a $BΣ1(<)$ sentence can witness that the languages are disjoint. The proof refines an algebraic argument from Almeida and the third author. When separation is possible, we also express a separator by saturating one of the original languages by a suitable congruence. Following the same line, we show that one can as well decide whether two regular languages can be separated by an unambiguous language, albeit with a higher complexity.

preprint2011arXiv

A decidable characterization of locally testable tree languages

A regular tree language L is locally testable if membership of a tree in L depends only on the presence or absence of some fix set of neighborhoods in the tree. In this paper we show that it is decidable whether a regular tree language is locally testable. The decidability is shown for ranked trees and for unranked unordered trees.