From Well Structured Transition Systems to Program Verification
We describe the use of the theory of WSTS for verifying programs.
Researcher profile
Alain Finkel
Alain Finkel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
4 published item(s)
preprint2020arXiv
Property-Directed Verification of Recurrent Neural Networks
This paper presents a property-directed approach to verifying recurrent neural networks (RNNs). To this end, we learn a deterministic finite automaton as a surrogate model from a given RNN using active automata learning. This model may then be analyzed using model checking as verification technique. The term property-directed reflects the idea that our procedure is guided and controlled by the given property rather than performing the two steps separately. We show that this not only allows us to discover small counterexamples fast, but also to generalize them by pumping towards faulty flows hinting at the underlying error in the RNN.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
Bounded Parikh Automata
The Parikh finite word automaton model (PA) was introduced and studied by Klaedtke and Ruess in 2003. Here, by means of related models, it is shown that the bounded languages recognized by PA are the same as those recognized by deterministic PA. Moreover, this class of languages is the class of bounded languages whose set of iterations is semilinear.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
On the expressiveness of Parikh automata and related models
The Parikh finite word automaton (PA) was introduced and studied by Klaedtke and Ruess in 2003. Natural variants of the PA arise from viewing a PA equivalently as an automaton that keeps a count of its transitions and semilinearly constrains their numbers. Here we adopt this view and define the affine PA (APA), that extends the PA by having each transition induce an affine transformation on the PA registers, and the PA on letters (LPA), that restricts the PA by forcing any two transitions on same letter to affect the registers equally. Then we report on the expressiveness, closure, and decidability properties of such PA variants. We note that deterministic PA are strictly weaker than deterministic reversal-bounded counter machines. We develop pumping-style lemmas and identify an explicit PA language recognized by no deterministic PA.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access