BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Malte Probst

Malte Probst appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Neural and Evolutionary Computinghep-thMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Conformal and non-conformal hyperloop deformations of the 1/2 BPS circle

We construct new large classes of BPS Wilson hyperloops in three-dimensional ${\cal N}=4$ quiver Chern-Simons-matter theory on $S^3$. The main strategy is to start with the 1/2 BPS Wilson loop of this theory, choose any linear combination of the supercharges it preserves, and look for deformations built out of the matter fields that still preserve that supercharge. This is a powerful generalization of a recently developed approach based on deformations of 1/4 and 1/8 BPS bosonic loops, which itself was far more effective at discovering new operators than older methods relying on complicated ansatze. We discover many new moduli spaces of BPS hyperloops preserving varied numbers of supersymmetries and varied subsets of the symmetries of the 1/2 BPS operator. In particular, we find new bosonic operators preserving 2 or 3 supercharges as well as new families of loops that do not share supercharges with any bosonic loops, including subclasses of both 1/8 and 1/4 BPS loops that are conformal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Roadmap on Wilson loops in 3d Chern-Simons-matter theories

This is a compact review of recent results on supersymmetric Wilson loops in ABJ(M) and related theories. It aims to be a quick introduction to the state of the art in the field and a discussion of open problems. It is divided into short chapters devoted to different questions and techniques. Some new results, perspectives and speculations are also presented. We hope this might serve as a baseline for further studies of this topic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Deep Boltzmann Machines in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization

Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) require flexible probability models that can be efficiently learned and sampled. Deep Boltzmann Machines (DBMs) are generative neural networks with these desired properties. We integrate a DBM into an EDA and evaluate the performance of this system in solving combinatorial optimization problems with a single objective. We compare the results to the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm. The performance of DBM-EDA was superior to BOA for difficult additively decomposable functions, i.e., concatenated deceptive traps of higher order. For most other benchmark problems, DBM-EDA cannot clearly outperform BOA, or other neural network-based EDAs. In particular, it often yields optimal solutions for a subset of the runs (with fewer evaluations than BOA), but is unable to provide reliable convergence to the global optimum competitively. At the same time, the model building process is computationally more expensive than that of other EDAs using probabilistic models from the neural network family, such as DAE-EDA.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Generative Adversarial Networks in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization

Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) require flexible probability models that can be efficiently learned and sampled. Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) are generative neural networks which can be trained to implicitly model the probability distribution of given data, and it is possible to sample this distribution. We integrate a GAN into an EDA and evaluate the performance of this system when solving combinatorial optimization problems with a single objective. We use several standard benchmark problems and compare the results to state-of-the-art multivariate EDAs. GAN-EDA doe not yield competitive results - the GAN lacks the ability to quickly learn a good approximation of the probability distribution. A key reason seems to be the large amount of noise present in the first EDA generations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Denoising Autoencoders for fast Combinatorial Black Box Optimization

Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) require flexible probability models that can be efficiently learned and sampled. Autoencoders (AE) are generative stochastic networks with these desired properties. We integrate a special type of AE, the Denoising Autoencoder (DAE), into an EDA and evaluate the performance of DAE-EDA on several combinatorial optimization problems with a single objective. We asses the number of fitness evaluations as well as the required CPU times. We compare the results to the performance to the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) and RBM-EDA, another EDA which is based on a generative neural network which has proven competitive with BOA. For the considered problem instances, DAE-EDA is considerably faster than BOA and RBM-EDA, sometimes by orders of magnitude. The number of fitness evaluations is higher than for BOA, but competitive with RBM-EDA. These results show that DAEs can be useful tools for problems with low but non-negligible fitness evaluation costs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Training a Restricted Boltzmann Machine for Classification by Labeling Model Samples

We propose an alternative method for training a classification model. Using the MNIST set of handwritten digits and Restricted Boltzmann Machines, it is possible to reach a classification performance competitive to semi-supervised learning if we first train a model in an unsupervised fashion on unlabeled data only, and then manually add labels to model samples instead of training data samples with the help of a GUI. This approach can benefit from the fact that model samples can be presented to the human labeler in a video-like fashion, resulting in a higher number of labeled examples. Also, after some initial training, hard-to-classify examples can be distinguished from easy ones automatically, saving manual work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Scalability of using Restricted Boltzmann Machines for Combinatorial Optimization

Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) require flexible probability models that can be efficiently learned and sampled. Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) are generative neural networks with these desired properties. We integrate an RBM into an EDA and evaluate the performance of this system in solving combinatorial optimization problems with a single objective. We assess how the number of fitness evaluations and the CPU time scale with problem size and with problem complexity. The results are compared to the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm, a state-of-the-art EDA. Although RBM-EDA requires larger population sizes and a larger number of fitness evaluations, it outperforms BOA in terms of CPU times, in particular if the problem is large or complex. RBM-EDA requires less time for model building than BOA. These results highlight the potential of using generative neural networks for combinatorial optimization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access