Researcher profile

Magnus Bordewich

Magnus Bordewich contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Evaluating Gaussian Grasp Maps for Generative Grasping Models

Generalising robotic grasping to previously unseen objects is a key task in general robotic manipulation. The current method for training many antipodal generative grasping models rely on a binary ground truth grasp map generated from the centre thirds of correctly labelled grasp rectangles. However, these binary maps do not accurately reflect the positions in which a robotic arm can correctly grasp a given object. We propose a continuous Gaussian representation of annotated grasps to generate ground truth training data which achieves a higher success rate on a simulated robotic grasping benchmark. Three modern generative grasping networks are trained with either binary or Gaussian grasp maps, along with recent advancements from the robotic grasping literature, such as discretisation of grasp angles into bins and an attentional loss function. Despite negligible difference according to the standard rectangle metric, Gaussian maps better reproduce the training data and therefore improve success rates when tested on the same simulated robot arm by avoiding collisions with the object: achieving 87.94\% accuracy. Furthermore, the best performing model is shown to operate with a high success rate when transferred to a real robotic arm, at high inference speeds, without the need for transfer learning. The system is then shown to be capable of performing grasps on an antagonistic physical object dataset benchmark.