Researcher profile

Madhusudhan Venkadesan

Madhusudhan Venkadesan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Rheological basis of skeletal muscle work loops

Skeletal muscle is subjected to simultaneous time-varying neural stimuli and length changes in vivo. Work loops are experimental representations of these in vivo conditions and exhibit force versus length responses that are not explainable using either soft matter rheology or the classical isometric and isotonic characterizations of muscle. These gaps in our understanding have often prompted the search for new muscle phenomena. However, we presently lack a framework to explain the mechanical origins of work loops that integrates multiple facets of current understanding of muscle, as a rheological material and also a stimulus-responsive actuator. Here we present a new hypothesis that work loops emerge by splicing together force versus length loops corresponding to different constant stimuli. Using published muscle datasets and a detailed sarcomere model, we find that the hypothesis accurately predicts work loops and helps understand them in terms of rheological behaviors measured at fixed-stimuli. Importantly, this framework identifies conditions under which a rheological understanding of muscle fails to explain the emergent work loops, and new muscle phenomena may be necessary to explain its in vivo function.

preprint2018arXiv

How to run on rough terrains

Stability of running on rough terrain depends on the propagation of perturbations due to the ground. We consider stability within the sagittal plane and model the dynamics of running as a two-dimensional body with an alternating aerial and stance phase. Stance is modeled as a passive, impulsive collision followed by an active, impulsive push-off that compensates for collisional losses. Such a runner has infinitely many strategies to maintain periodic gaits on flat ground. However, these strategies differ in how perturbations due to terrain unevenness are propagated. Instabilities manifest as tumbling (orientational instability) or failing to maintain a steady speed (translational instability). We find that open-loop strategies that avoid sensory feedback are sufficient to maintain stability on step-like terrains with piecewise flat surfaces that randomly vary in height. However, these open-loop runners lose orientational stability on rough terrains whose slope and height vary randomly. Only by avoiding tangential collisions is orientational stability recovered. Tangential collisions may be avoided through leg-retraction to match foot and ground speed at touch down. By analyzing the propagation of perturbations, we derive a single dimensionless parameter that governs stability and guides the design and control of both biological and robotic runners.

preprint2017arXiv

Stiffness of the human foot and evolution of the transverse arch

Foot stiffness underlies its mechanical function, and is central to the evolution of human bipedal locomotion. The stiff and propulsive human foot has two distinct arches, the longitudinal and transverse. By contrast, the feet of non-human primates are flat and softer. Current understanding of foot stiffness is based on studies that focus solely on the longitudinal arch, and little is known about the mechanical function of the transverse arch. However, common experience suggests that transverse curvature dominates the stiffness; a drooping dollar bill stiffens significantly upon curling it along the transverse direction, not the longitudinal. We derive a normalized curvature parameter that encapsulates the geometric principle underlying the transverse curvature-induced stiffness. We show that the transverse arch accounts for almost all the difference in stiffness between human and monkey feet (vervet monkeys and pig-tailed macaques) by comparing transverse curvature-based predictions against published data on foot stiffness. Using this functional interpretation of the transverse arch, we trace the evolution of hominin feet and show that a human-like stiff foot likely predates Homo by $\sim 1.5$ million years, and appears in the $\sim 3.4$ million year old fossil from Burtele. A distinctly human-like transverse arch is also present in early members of Homo, including Homo naledi, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus. However, the $\sim 3.2$ million year old Australopithecus afarensis is estimated to have possessed a transitional foot, softer than humans and stiffer than other extant primates. A foot with human-like stiffness probably evolved around the same time as other lower limb adaptations for regular bipedality, and well before the emergence of Homo, the longitudinal arch, and other adaptations for endurance running.