Paper detail

Stiffness of the human foot and evolution of the transverse arch

Foot stiffness underlies its mechanical function, and is central to the evolution of human bipedal locomotion. The stiff and propulsive human foot has two distinct arches, the longitudinal and transverse. By contrast, the feet of non-human primates are flat and softer. Current understanding of foot stiffness is based on studies that focus solely on the longitudinal arch, and little is known about the mechanical function of the transverse arch. However, common experience suggests that transverse curvature dominates the stiffness; a drooping dollar bill stiffens significantly upon curling it along the transverse direction, not the longitudinal. We derive a normalized curvature parameter that encapsulates the geometric principle underlying the transverse curvature-induced stiffness. We show that the transverse arch accounts for almost all the difference in stiffness between human and monkey feet (vervet monkeys and pig-tailed macaques) by comparing transverse curvature-based predictions against published data on foot stiffness. Using this functional interpretation of the transverse arch, we trace the evolution of hominin feet and show that a human-like stiff foot likely predates Homo by $\sim 1.5$ million years, and appears in the $\sim 3.4$ million year old fossil from Burtele. A distinctly human-like transverse arch is also present in early members of Homo, including Homo naledi, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus. However, the $\sim 3.2$ million year old Australopithecus afarensis is estimated to have possessed a transitional foot, softer than humans and stiffer than other extant primates. A foot with human-like stiffness probably evolved around the same time as other lower limb adaptations for regular bipedality, and well before the emergence of Homo, the longitudinal arch, and other adaptations for endurance running.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.