Paper detail

Rheological basis of skeletal muscle work loops

Skeletal muscle is subjected to simultaneous time-varying neural stimuli and length changes in vivo. Work loops are experimental representations of these in vivo conditions and exhibit force versus length responses that are not explainable using either soft matter rheology or the classical isometric and isotonic characterizations of muscle. These gaps in our understanding have often prompted the search for new muscle phenomena. However, we presently lack a framework to explain the mechanical origins of work loops that integrates multiple facets of current understanding of muscle, as a rheological material and also a stimulus-responsive actuator. Here we present a new hypothesis that work loops emerge by splicing together force versus length loops corresponding to different constant stimuli. Using published muscle datasets and a detailed sarcomere model, we find that the hypothesis accurately predicts work loops and helps understand them in terms of rheological behaviors measured at fixed-stimuli. Importantly, this framework identifies conditions under which a rheological understanding of muscle fails to explain the emergent work loops, and new muscle phenomena may be necessary to explain its in vivo function.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.