Source author record

Lutz Mattner

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

8works
6topics
4close collaborators

Published work

8 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Extreme expectations of Bernoulli convolutions given their first few moments are attained at shifted convolutions of as few binomials

A result of Chebyshev (1864) and Hoeffding1956}, on bounding an expectation of a given function with respect to a Bernoulli convolution (also called Poisson binomial law, or law of the number of successes in independent trials) with any given first moment, is here generalised to the case of any given first few moments, as indicated in the title. A nonprobabilistic, and perhaps more obvious, reformulation is: Every permutation invariant and separately affine-linear function of nn real variables xi∈[a,b]x_i\in[a,b] assumes its extremal values given the power sums ∑i=1nxi1,…,∑i=1nxir\sum_{i=1}^nx_i^1,\ldots, \sum_{i=1}^nx_i^r at vectors xx with at most rr coordinate values different from aa and bb.

preprint2014arXiv

On normal approximations to symmetric hypergeometric laws

The Kolmogorov distances between a symmetric hypergeometric law with standard deviation σσ and its usual normal approximations are computed and shown to be less than 1/(8π σ)1/(\sqrt{8π}\,σ), with the order 1/σ1/σ and the constant 1/8π1/\sqrt{8π} being optimal. The results of Hipp and Mattner (2007) for symmetric binomial laws are obtained as special cases. Connections to Berry-Esseen type results in more general situations concerning sums of simple random samples or Bernoulli convolutions are explained. Auxiliary results of independent interest include rather sharp normal distribution function inequalities, a simple identifiability result for hypergeometric laws, and some remarks related to Lévy's concentration-variance inequality.

preprint2014arXiv

Partially complete sufficient statistics are jointly complete

The theory of the basic statistical concept of (Lehmann-Scheffé-)completeness is perfected by providing the theorem indicated in the title and previously overlooked for several decades. Relations to earlier results are discussed and illustrating examples are presented. Of the two proofs offered for the main result, the first is direct and short, following the prototypical example of Landers and Rogge (1976), and the second is very short and purely statistical, utilizing the basic theory of optimal unbiased estimation in the little known version completed by Schmetterer and Strasser (1974).

preprint2012arXiv

Confidence bounds for the sensitivity lack of a less specific diagnostic test, without gold standard

We consider the problem of comparing two diagnostic tests based on a sample of paired test results without true state determinations, in cases where the second test can reasonably be assumed to be at least as specific as the first. For such cases, we provide two informative confidence bounds: A lower one for the prevalence times the sensitivity gain of the second test with respect to the first, and an upper one for the sensitivity of the first test. Neither conditional independence of the two tests nor perfectness of any of them needs to be assumd. An application of the proposed confidence bounds to a sample of 256 pairs of laboratory test results for toxigenic Clostridium difficile provides evidence for a dramatic sensitivity gain through first appropriately culturing Clostridium difficile from stool samples before applying an enzyme-immuno-assay.

preprint2011arXiv

Combining individually valid and conditionally i.i.d. P-variables

For a given testing problem, let U1,...,UnU_1,...,U_n be individually valid and conditionally on the data i.i.d.\ P-variables (often called P-values). For example, the data could come in groups, and each UiU_i could be based on subsampling just one datum from each group in order to satisfy an independence assumption under the hypothesis. The problem is then to deterministically combine the UiU_i into a valid summary P-variable. Restricting here our attention to functions of a given order statistic Uk:nU_{k:n} of the UiU_i, we compute the function fn,kf_{n,k} which is smallest among all increasing functions ff such that f(Uk:n)f(U_{k:n}) is always a valid P-variable under the stated assumptions. Since fn,k(u)≤1∧(nku)f_{n,k}(u)\le 1\wedge (\frac {n}{k} u), with the right hand side being a good approximation for the left when kk is large, one may in particular always take the minimum of 1 and twice the left sample median of the given P-variables. We sketch the original application of the above in a recent study of associations between various primate species by Astaras et al.

preprint2010arXiv

Stochastic ordering of classical discrete distributions

For several pairs (P,Q)(P,Q) of classical distributions on N0\N_0, we show that their stochastic ordering P≤stQP\leq_{st} Q can be characterized by their extreme tail ordering equivalent to P({k∗})/Q({k∗})≤1≤lim⁡k→k∗P({k})/Q({k}) P(\{k_\ast \})/Q(\{k_\ast\}) \le 1 \le \lim_{k\to k^\ast} P(\{k\})/Q(\{k\}), with k∗k_\ast and k∗k^\ast denoting the minimum and the supremum of the support of P+QP+Q, and with the limit to be read as P({k∗})/Q({k∗})P(\{k^\ast\})/Q(\{k^\ast\}) for k∗k^\ast finite. This includes in particular all pairs where PP and QQ are both binomial (bn1,p1≤stbn2,p2b_{n_1,p_1} \leq_{st} b_{n_2,p_2} if and only if n1≤n2n_1\le n_2 and (1−p1)n1≥(1−p2)n2(1-p_1)^{n_1}\ge(1-p_2)^{n_2}, or p1=0p_1=0), both negative binomial (br1,p1−≤stbr2,p2−b^-_{r_1,p_1}\leq_{st} b^-_{r_2,p_2} if and only if p1≥p2p_1\geq p_2 and p1r1≥p2r2p_1^{r_1}\geq p_2^{r_2}), or both hypergeometric with the same sample size parameter. The binomial case is contained in a known result about Bernoulli convolutions, the other two cases appear to be new. The emphasis of this paper is on providing a variety of different methods of proofs: (i) half monotone likelihood ratios, (ii) explicit coupling, (iii) Markov chain comparison, (iv) analytic calculation, and (v) comparison of Levy measures. We give four proofs in the binomial case (methods (i)-(iv)) and three in the negative binomial case (methods (i), (iv) and (v)). The statement for hypergeometric distributions is proved via method (i).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.