BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
Consider a random walk with a drift to the right on {0,…,k} where k is random and geometrically distributed. We show that the tail P[T>t] of the length T of an excursion from 0 decreases up to constants like t−ϱ for some ϱ>0 but is not regularly varying. We compute the oscillations of tϱP[T>t] as t→∞ explicitly.
Consider the infinite rate mutually catalytic branching process (IMUB) constructed in [Infinite rate mutually catalytic branching in infinitely many colonies. Construction, characterization and convergence (2008) Preprint] and [Ann. Probab. 38 (2010) 479-497]. For finite initial conditions, we show that only one type survives in the long run if the interaction kernel is recurrent. On the other hand, under a slightly stronger condition than transience, we show that both types can coexist.
We construct a mutually catalytic branching process on a countable site space with infinite "branching rate". The finite rate mutually catalytic model, in which the rate of branching of one population at a site is proportional to the mass of the other population at that site, was introduced by Dawson and Perkins in [DP98]. We show that our model is the limit for a class of models and in particular for the Dawson-Perkins model as the rate of branching goes to infinity. Our process is characterized as the unique solution to a martingale problem. We also give a characterization of the process as a weak solution of an infinite system of stochastic integral equations driven by a Poisson noise.
Dawson and Perkins [Ann. Probab. 26 (1988) 1088--1138] constructed a stochastic model of an interacting two-type population indexed by a countable site space which locally undergoes a mutually catalytic branching mechanism. In Klenke and Mytnik [Preprint (2008), arXiv:0901.0623], it is shown that as the branching rate approaches infinity, the process converges to a process that is called the infinite rate mutually catalytic branching process (IMUB). It is most conveniently characterized as the solution of a certain martingale problem. While in the latter reference, a noise equation approach is used in order to construct a solution to this martingale problem, the aim of this paper is to provide a Trotter-type construction. The construction presented here will be used in a forthcoming paper, Klenke and Mytnik [Preprint (2009)], to investigate the long-time behavior of IMUB (coexistence versus segregation of types). This paper is partly based on the Ph.D. thesis of the second author (2008), where the Trotter approach was first introduced.
Consider the mutually catalytic branching process with finite branching rate γ. We show that as γ→∞, this process converges in finite-dimensional distributions (in time) to a certain discontinuous process. We give descriptions of this process in terms of its semigroup in terms of the infinitesimal generator and as the solution of a martingale problem. We also give a strong construction in terms of a planar Brownian motion from which we infer a path property of the process. This is the first paper in a series or three, wherein we also construct an interacting version of this process and study its long-time behavior.
For several pairs (P,Q) of classical distributions on N0, we show that their stochastic ordering P≤stQ can be characterized by their extreme tail ordering equivalent to P({k∗})/Q({k∗})≤1≤limk→k∗P({k})/Q({k}), with k∗ and k∗ denoting the minimum and the supremum of the support of P+Q, and with the limit to be read as P({k∗})/Q({k∗}) for k∗ finite. This includes in particular all pairs where P and Q are both binomial (bn1,p1≤stbn2,p2 if and only if n1≤n2 and (1−p1)n1≥(1−p2)n2, or p1=0), both negative binomial (br1,p1−≤stbr2,p2− if and only if p1≥p2 and p1r1≥p2r2), or both hypergeometric with the same sample size parameter. The binomial case is contained in a known result about Bernoulli convolutions, the other two cases appear to be new. The emphasis of this paper is on providing a variety of different methods of proofs: (i) half monotone likelihood ratios, (ii) explicit coupling, (iii) Markov chain comparison, (iv) analytic calculation, and (v) comparison of Levy measures. We give four proofs in the binomial case (methods (i)-(iv)) and three in the negative binomial case (methods (i), (iv) and (v)). The statement for hypergeometric distributions is proved via method (i).
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.