Source author record

Luis Pedrero

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Strong pinning of vortices by antiferromagnetic domain boundaries in CeCo(In1−x_{1-x}Cdx_x)5_5

We have studied the isothermal magnetization M(H)M(H) of CeCo(In1−x_{1-x}Cdx_x)5_5 with xx = 0.0075 and 0.01 down to 50 mK. Pronounced field-history dependent phenomena occur in the coexistence regime of the superconducting and antiferromagnetic phases. At low-fields, a phenomenological model of magnetic-flux entry well explains M(H)M(H) implying the dominance of bulk pinning effect. However, unless crystallographic quenched disorder is hysteretic, the asymmetric peak effect (ASPE) which appears at higher fields cannot be explained by the pinning of vortices due to material defects. Also the temperature dependence of the ASPE deviates from the conventional scenario for the peak effect. Comparison of our thermodynamic phase diagrams with those from previous neutron scattering and magnetoresistance experiments indicates that the pinning of vortices takes place at the field-history dependent antiferromagnetic domain boundaries.

preprint2013arXiv

Magnetization study of the energy scales in YbRh2_{2}Si2_{2} under chemical pressure

We present a systematic study of the magnetization in YbRh2_{2}Si2_{2} under slightly negative (6?% Ir substitution) and positive (7% Co substitution) chemical pressure. We show how the critical field H0H_{0}, associated with the high-field Lifshitz transitions, is shifted to lower (higher) values with Co (Ir) substitution. The critical field HNH_{\mathrm{N}}, which identifies the boundary line of the antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase TN(H)T_{\mathrm{N}}(H) increases with positive pressure and it approaches zero with 6% Ir substitution. On the other side, the crossover field H∗H^{*}, associated with the energy scale T∗(H)T^{*}(H) where a reconstruction of the Fermi surface has been observed, is not much influenced by the chemical substitution.}{Following the analysis proposed in Refs.\,\cite{Paschen2004,Gegenwart2007,Friedemann2009,Tokiwa2009a} we have fitted the quantity M~(H)=M+(dM/dH)H\tilde{M}(H)=M+(dM/dH)H with a crossover function to indentify H∗H^{*}. The T∗(H)T^{*}(H) line follows an almost linear HH-dependence at sufficiently high fields outside the AFM phase, but it deviates from linearity at T≤TN(0)T \le T_{\mathrm{N}}(0) and in Yb(Rh0.93_{0.93}Co0.07_{0.07})2_{2}Si2_{2} it changes slope clearly inside the AFM phase. Moreover, the FWHM of the fit function depends linearly on temperature outside the phase, but remains constant inside, suggesting either that such an analysis is valid only for T≥TN(0)T \ge T_{\mathrm{N}}(0) or that the Fermi surface changes continuously at T=0T = 0 inside the AFM phase.}}

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.