BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Litian Zhang

Litian Zhang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and SecurityComputation and LanguageMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

From static to adaptive: immune memory-based jailbreak detection for large language models

Large Language Models (LLMs) serve as the backbone of modern AI systems, yet they remain susceptible to adversarial jailbreak attacks. Consequently, robust detection of such malicious inputs is paramount for ensuring model safety. Traditional detection methods typically rely on external models trained on fixed, large-scale datasets, which often incur significant computational overhead. While recent methods shift toward leveraging internal safety signals of models to enable more lightweight and efficient detection. However, these methods remain inherently static and struggle to adapt to the evolving nature of jailbreak attacks. Drawing inspiration from the biological immune mechanism, we introduce the Immune Memory Adaptive Guard (IMAG) framework. By distilling and encoding safety patterns into a persistent, evolvable memory bank, IMAG enables adaptive generalization to emerging threats. Specifically, the framework orchestrates three synergistic components: Immune Detection, which employs retrieval for high-efficiency interception of known jailbreak attacks; Active Immunity, which performs proactive behavioral simulation to resolve ambiguous unknown queries; Memory Updating, which integrates validated attack patterns back into the memory bank. This closed-loop architecture transitions LLM defense from rigid filtering to autonomous adaptive mitigation. Extensive evaluations across five representative open-source LLMs demonstrate that our method surpasses state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines, achieving a superior average detection accuracy of 94\% across diverse and complex attack types.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

How Real is Your Jailbreak? Fine-grained Jailbreak Evaluation with Anchored Reference

Jailbreak attacks present a significant challenge to the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet current automated evaluation methods largely rely on coarse classifications that focus mainly on harmfulness, leading to substantial overestimation of attack success. To address this problem, we propose FJAR, a fine-grained jailbreak evaluation framework with anchored references. We first categorized jailbreak responses into five fine-grained categories: Rejective, Irrelevant, Unhelpful, Incorrect, and Successful, based on the degree to which the response addresses the malicious intent of the query. This categorization serves as the basis for FJAR. Then, we introduce a novel harmless tree decomposition approach to construct high-quality anchored references by breaking down the original queries. These references guide the evaluator in determining whether the response genuinely fulfills the original query. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FJAR achieves the highest alignment with human judgment and effectively identifies the root causes of jailbreak failures, providing actionable guidance for improving attack strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Jailbreaking LLMs & VLMs: Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Unified Defense

This paper provides a systematic survey of jailbreak attacks and defenses on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), emphasizing that jailbreak vulnerabilities stem from structural factors such as incomplete training data, linguistic ambiguity, and generative uncertainty. It further differentiates between hallucinations and jailbreaks in terms of intent and triggering mechanisms. We propose a three-dimensional survey framework: (1) Attack dimension-including template/encoding-based, in-context learning manipulation, reinforcement/adversarial learning, LLM-assisted and fine-tuned attacks, as well as prompt- and image-level perturbations and agent-based transfer in VLMs; (2) Defense dimension-encompassing prompt-level obfuscation, output evaluation, and model-level alignment or fine-tuning; and (3) Evaluation dimension-covering metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), toxicity score, query/time cost, and multimodal Clean Accuracy and Attribute Success Rate. Compared with prior works, this survey spans the full spectrum from text-only to multimodal settings, consolidating shared mechanisms and proposing unified defense principles: variant-consistency and gradient-sensitivity detection at the perception layer, safety-aware decoding and output review at the generation layer, and adversarially augmented preference alignment at the parameter layer. Additionally, we summarize existing multimodal safety benchmarks and discuss future directions, including automated red teaming, cross-modal collaborative defense, and standardized evaluation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

LANCET: Neural Intervention via Structural Entropy for Mitigating Faithfulness Hallucinations in LLMs

Large Language Models have revolutionized information processing, yet their reliability is severely compromised by faithfulness hallucinations. While current approaches attempt to mitigate this issue through node-level adjustments or coarse suppression, they often overlook the distributed nature of neural information, leading to imprecise interventions. Recognizing that hallucinations propagate through specific forward transmission pathways like an infection, we aim to surgically block this flow using precise structural analysis. To leverage this, we propose Lancet, a novel framework that achieves precise neural intervention by leveraging structural entropy and hallucination difference ratios. Lancet first locates hallucination-prone neurons via gradient-driven contrastive analysis, then maps their propagation pathways by minimizing structural entropy, and finally implements a hierarchical intervention strategy that preserves general model capabilities. Comprehensive evaluations across hallucination benchmark datasets demonstrate that Lancet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, validating the effectiveness of our surgical approach to neural intervention.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

PropGuard: Safeguarding LLM-MAS via Propagation-Aware Exploration and Remediation

LLM-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS) have become a promising paradigm for solving complex tasks through role specialization, tool use, memory, and collaborative reasoning. However, these interactions create new security risks that malicious instructions injected through messages, tools, or memories can propagate across agents and rounds, causing system-level compromise. Existing defenses largely rely on local filtering or graph-based anomaly detection, but they often fail to trace fine-grained propagation paths or remediate contaminated states without disrupting benign collaboration. We propose PropGuard, a propagation-aware framework for safeguarding LLM-MAS. PropGuard constructs a dual-view spatio-temporal graph that combines response-centric risk estimation with full-state evidence preservation. Guided by these risk priors, a GE-GRPO trained inspector sequentially explores the full-state graph to recover compact suspicious propagation subgraphs. PropGuard then verifies harmful propagation through subgraph-aware diagnosis and applies source-guided remediation to correct upstream contamination and replay affected downstream interactions. Experiments across four communication architectures and five attack settings demonstrate that PropGuard consistently lowers attack success while maintaining high task-level defense success, achieving a favorable effectiveness--efficiency trade-off.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Securing Computer-Use Agents: A Unified Architecture-Lifecycle Framework for Deployment-Grounded Reliability

Computer-use agents(CUAs)are moving frombounded benchmarks toward real software environments, wherethey operate browsers, desktops, mobile applications, flesystems,terminals, and tool backends. In such settings, reliability isno longer captured by task success alone: perception errors,planning drift, memory use, tool mediation, permission scope,and runtime oversight jointly determine whether agent actionsremain aligned with user intent, Existing surveys organize theCUA landscape by methods, platforms, benchmarks, or securitythreats, but less explicitly connect capability formation, author-ity exposure, failure manifestation, and control placement. Toaddress this gap, the article develops an architecture-lifecycleframework for deployment-grounded reliability in CUAs. Thearchitectural view analyzes Perception, Decision, and Executionas coupled layers that transform software observations intoauthority-bearing actions, The lifecycle view examines Creation.Deployment, Operation, and Maintenance as stages in which priorsare learned, tools and permissions are bound, runtime trajecto.ries are stressed, and assurance must be preserved under drift.Using this lens, the analysis synthesizes representative systems,benchmarks, and security/privacy studies; distinguishes wherefailures become visible from where their enabling conditions areintroduced, and maps recurring intervention surfaces for controloversight, and assurance. OpenClaw is used only as a public moti.vating example of an open deployment pattern, not as a verifedinternal case study. The conclusion highlights open challengesin controllable grounding, long-horizon constraint preservation,safe authority binding, mixed-trust runtime defense, privacy-preserving memory,and continual assurance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access