Researcher profile

Linus Magnusson

Linus Magnusson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Extreme Weather Bench: A framework and benchmark for evaluation of high-impact weather

Forecasting the wide variety of high-impact weather events experienced globally is a challenge for both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models and it is critical that such models be properly verified before deployment. Although AI weather models are rapidly evolving, much of their evaluation is currently done either with a global-scale evaluation or by hand-picking a small number of case studies or a region. A widely-used open-source benchmark suite focusing on high-impact weather will help to drive the science forward for all scales of weather models, as it has for other AI fields. Here we introduce Extreme Weather Bench (EWB), a new community-driven benchmark suite that facilitates model validation and verification on a variety of high-impact hazards that matter to people around the globe. EWB provides a standard set of case studies (spanning across multiple spatial and temporal scales and different parts of the weather spectrum), observational data, impact-based metrics, and open-source code for users to evaluate their models. Verifying that a model works against a standard set of case studies, especially events that are high-impact for the general public, is a key piece of improving the trustworthiness of AI models. EWB will help to drive the science forward for all weather models, enabling true comparisons across models and evaluating models on specific high-impact phenomena through the use of case studies. EWB is a free open-source community-driven system and will continue to evolve to include additional phenomena, test cases and metrics in collaboration with the worldwide weather and forecast verification community.

preprint2021arXiv

What do large-scale patterns teach us about extreme precipitation over the Mediterranean at medium- and extended-range forecasts?

Extreme Precipitation Events (EPEs) can have devastating consequences such as floods and landslides, posing a great threat to society and the economy. Predicting such events long in advance can support the mitigation of negative impacts. Here, we focus on EPEs over the Mediterranean, a region that is frequently affected by such hazards. Previous work identified strong connections between localized EPEs and large-scale atmospheric flow patterns, affecting the weather over the entire Mediterranean. We analyze the predictive skill of these patterns in the ECMWF extended-range forecasts and assess if and where these patterns can be used for indirect predictions of EPEs, using the Brier Skill Score. The results show that the ECMWF model provides skillful predictions of the Mediterranean patterns up to 2 weeks in advance. Moreover, using the forecasted patterns for indirect predictability of EPEs outperforms the reference score up to about 10 days lead time for many locations. Especially for high orography locations or coastal areas, like parts of western Turkey, western Balkans, Iberian Peninsula and Morocco this limit extends from 11 to 14 days lead time. This study demonstrates that connections between localized EPEs and large-scale patterns over the Mediterranean extend the forecasting horizon of the model by over 3 days in many locations, in comparison to forecasting based on the predicted precipitation. Thus, it is beneficial to use the predicted patterns rather than the predicted precipitation at longer lead times for EPEs forecasting. The model's performance is also assessed from a user perspective, showing that the EPEs forecasting based on the patterns increases the economic benefits at medium and extended range lead times. Such information could support higher confidence in the decision-making of various users, e.g., the agricultural sector and (re)insurance companies.