BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lieven De Lathauwer

Lieven De Lathauwer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical AnalysisComputational Complexityeess.SPMachine LearningNeurons and Cognition

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Canonical Polyadic Decomposition via the generalized Schur decomposition

The canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) is a fundamental tensor decomposition which expresses a tensor as a sum of rank one tensors. In stark contrast to the matrix case, with light assumptions, the CPD of a low rank tensor is (essentially) unique. The essential uniqueness of CPD makes this decomposition a powerful tool in many applications as it allows for extraction of component information from a signal of interest. One popular algorithm for algebraic computation of a CPD is the generalized eigenvalue decomposition (GEVD) which selects a matrix subpencil of a tensor, then computes the generalized eigenvectors of the pencil. In this article, we present a simplification of GEVD which improves the accuracy of the algorithm. Surprisingly, the generalized eigenvector computation in GEVD is in fact unnecessary and can be replaced by a QZ decomposition which factors a pair of matrices as a product of unitary and upper triangular matrices. Computing a QZ decomposition is a standard first step when computing generalized eigenvectors, so our algorithm can been seen as a direct simplification of GEVD.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Equivalent Polyadic Decompositions of Matrix Multiplication Tensors

Invariance transformations of polyadic decompositions of matrix multiplication tensors define an equivalence relation on the set of such decompositions. In this paper, we present an algorithm to efficiently decide whether two polyadic decompositions of a given matrix multiplication tensor are equivalent. With this algorithm, we analyze the equivalence classes of decompositions of several matrix multiplication tensors. This analysis is relevant for the study of fast matrix multiplication as it relates to the question of how many essentially different fast matrix multiplication algorithms there exist. This question has been first studied by de~Groote, who showed that for the multiplication of $2\times2$ matrices with $7$ active multiplications, all algorithms are essentially equivalent to Strassen's algorithm. In contrast, the results of our analysis show that for the multiplication of larger matrices, (e.g., $2\times3$ by $3\times2$ or $3\times3$ by $3\times3$ matrices), two decompositions are very likely to be essentially different. We further provide a necessary criterion for a polyadic decomposition to be equivalent to a polyadic decomposition with integer entries. Decompositions with specific integer entries, e.g., powers of two, provide fast matrix multiplication algorithms with better efficiency and stability properties. This condition can be tested algorithmically and we present the conclusions obtained for the decompositions of small/medium matrix multiplication tensors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Early soft and flexible fusion of EEG and fMRI via tensor decompositions

Data fusion refers to the joint analysis of multiple datasets which provide complementary views of the same task. In this preprint, the problem of jointly analyzing electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data is considered. Jointly analyzing EEG and fMRI measurements is highly beneficial for studying brain function because these modalities have complementary spatiotemporal resolution: EEG offers good temporal resolution while fMRI is better in its spatial resolution. The fusion methods reported so far ignore the underlying multi-way nature of the data in at least one of the modalities and/or rely on very strong assumptions about the relation of the two datasets. In this preprint, these two points are addressed by adopting for the first time tensor models in the two modalities while also exploring double coupled tensor decompositions and by following soft and flexible coupling approaches to implement the multi-modal analysis. To cope with the Event Related Potential (ERP) variability in EEG, the PARAFAC2 model is adopted. The results obtained are compared against those of parallel Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and hard coupling alternatives in both simulated and real data. Our results confirm the superiority of tensorial methods over methods based on ICA. In scenarios that do not meet the assumptions underlying hard coupling, the advantage of soft and flexible coupled decompositions is clearly demonstrated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access