Source author record

Lea Weber

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Absolutely avoidable order-size pairs in hypergraphs

For fixed integer r≥2r\ge 2, we call a pair (m,f)(m,f) of integers, m≥1m\geq 1, 0≤f≤(mr)0\leq f \leq \binom{m}{r}, absolutelyabsolutely avoidableavoidable if there is n0n_0, such that for any pair of integers (n,e)(n,e) with n>n0n>n_0 and 0≤e≤(nr)0\leq e\leq \binom{n}{r} there is an rr-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices and ee edges that contains no induced sub-hypergraph on mm vertices and ff edges. Some pairs are clearly not absolutely avoidable, for example (m,0)(m,0) is not absolutely avoidable since any sufficiently sparse hypergraph on at least mm vertices contains independent sets on mm vertices. Here we show that for any r≥3r\ge 3 and m≥m0m \ge m_0, either the pair (m,⌊(mr)/2⌋)(m, \lfloor\binom mr/2\rfloor) or the pair (m,⌊(mr)/2⌋−m−1)(m, \lfloor\binom{m}{r}/2\rfloor-m-1) is absolutely avoidable. Next, following the definition of Erdős, Füredi, Rothschild and Sós, we define the densitydensity of a pair (m,f)(m,f) as σr(m,f)=lim sup⁡n→∞∣{e:(n,e)→(m,f)}∣(mr)σ_r(m,f) = \limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{|\{e : (n,e) \to (m,f)\}|}{\binom mr}. We show that for r≥3 r\ge 3 most pairs (m,f)(m,f) satisfy σr(m,f)=0σ_r(m,f)=0, and that for m>rm > r, there exists no pair (m,f)(m,f) of density 1.

preprint2022arXiv

Unavoidable order-size pairs in hypergraphs -- positive forcing density

Erdős, Füredi, Rothschild and Sós initiated a study of classes of graphs that forbid every induced subgraph on a given number mm of vertices and number ff of edges. Extending their notation to rr-graphs, we write (n,e)→r(m,f)(n,e) \to_r (m,f) if every rr-graph GG on nn vertices with ee edges has an induced subgraph on mm vertices and ff edges. The \emph{forcing density} of a pair (m,f)(m,f) is σr(m,f)=lim sup⁡n→∞∣{e:(n,e)→r(m,f)}∣(nr). σ_r(m,f) =\left. \limsup\limits_{n \to \infty} \frac{|\{e : (n,e) \to_r (m,f)\}|}{\binom{n}{r}} \right. . In the graph setting it is known that there are infinitely many pairs (m,f)(m, f) with positive forcing density. Weber asked if there is a pair of positive forcing density for r≥3r\geq 3 apart from the trivial ones (m,0)(m, 0) and (m,(mr))(m, \binom{m}{r}). Answering her question, we show that (6,10)(6,10) is such a pair for r=3r=3 and conjecture that it is the unique such pair. Further, we find necessary conditions for a pair to have positive forcing density, supporting this conjecture.

preprint2020arXiv

Bipartite independence number in graphs with bounded maximum degree

We consider a natural, yet seemingly not much studied, extremal problem in bipartite graphs. A bi-hole of size tt in a bipartite graph GG is a copy of Kt,tK_{t, t} in the bipartite complement of GG. Let f(n,Δ)f(n, Δ) be the largest kk for which every n×nn \times n bipartite graph with maximum degree ΔΔ in one of the parts has a bi-hole of size kk. Determining f(n,Δ)f(n, Δ) is thus the bipartite analogue of finding the largest independent set in graphs with a given number of vertices and bounded maximum degree. Our main result determines the asymptotic behavior of f(n,Δ)f(n, Δ). More precisely, we show that for large but fixed ΔΔ and nn sufficiently large, f(n,Δ)=Θ(log⁡ΔΔn)f(n, Δ) = Θ(\frac{\log Δ}Δ n). We further address more specific regimes of ΔΔ, especially when ΔΔ is a small fixed constant. In particular, we determine f(n,2)f(n, 2) exactly and obtain bounds for f(n,3)f(n, 3), though determining the precise value of f(n,3)f(n, 3) is still open.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.