Absolutely avoidable order-size pairs in hypergraphs

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

For fixed integer r≥2r\ge 2, we call a pair (m,f)(m,f) of integers, m≥1m\geq 1, 0≤f≤(mr)0\leq f \leq \binom{m}{r}, absolutelyabsolutely avoidableavoidable if there is n0n_0, such that for any pair of integers (n,e)(n,e) with n>n0n>n_0 and 0≤e≤(nr)0\leq e\leq \binom{n}{r} there is an rr-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices and ee edges that contains no induced sub-hypergraph on mm vertices and ff edges. Some pairs are clearly not absolutely avoidable, for example (m,0)(m,0) is not absolutely avoidable since any sufficiently sparse hypergraph on at least mm vertices contains independent sets on mm vertices. Here we show that for any r≥3r\ge 3 and m≥m0m \ge m_0, either the pair (m,⌊(mr)/2⌋)(m, \lfloor\binom mr/2\rfloor) or the pair (m,⌊(mr)/2⌋−m−1)(m, \lfloor\binom{m}{r}/2\rfloor-m-1) is absolutely avoidable. Next, following the definition of Erdős, Füredi, Rothschild and Sós, we define the densitydensity of a pair (m,f)(m,f) as σr(m,f)=lim sup⁡n→∞∣{e:(n,e)→(m,f)}∣(mr)σ_r(m,f) = \limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{|\{e : (n,e) \to (m,f)\}|}{\binom mr}. We show that for r≥3 r\ge 3 most pairs (m,f)(m,f) satisfy σr(m,f)=0σ_r(m,f)=0, and that for m>rm > r, there exists no pair (m,f)(m,f) of density 1.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.