Paper detail

Absolutely avoidable order-size pairs in hypergraphs

For fixed integer $r\ge 2$, we call a pair $(m,f)$ of integers, $m\geq 1$, $0\leq f \leq \binom{m}{r}$, $absolutely$ $avoidable$ if there is $n_0$, such that for any pair of integers $(n,e)$ with $n>n_0$ and $0\leq e\leq \binom{n}{r}$ there is an $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices and $e$ edges that contains no induced sub-hypergraph on $m$ vertices and $f$ edges. Some pairs are clearly not absolutely avoidable, for example $(m,0)$ is not absolutely avoidable since any sufficiently sparse hypergraph on at least $m$ vertices contains independent sets on $m$ vertices. Here we show that for any $r\ge 3$ and $m \ge m_0$, either the pair $(m, \lfloor\binom mr/2\rfloor)$ or the pair $(m, \lfloor\binom{m}{r}/2\rfloor-m-1)$ is absolutely avoidable. Next, following the definition of Erdős, Füredi, Rothschild and Sós, we define the $density$ of a pair $(m,f)$ as $σ_r(m,f) = \limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{|\{e : (n,e) \to (m,f)\}|}{\binom mr}$. We show that for $ r\ge 3$ most pairs $(m,f)$ satisfy $σ_r(m,f)=0$, and that for $m > r$, there exists no pair $(m,f)$ of density 1.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.