BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Laigang Guo

Laigang Guo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information Theorymath.ITmath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Proving Information Inequalities and Identities with Symbolic Computation

Proving linear inequalities and identities of Shannon's information measures, possibly with linear constraints on the information measures, is an important problem in information theory. For this purpose, ITIP and other variant algorithms have been developed and implemented, which are all based on solving a linear program (LP). In particular, an identity $f = 0$ is verified by solving two LPs, one for $f \ge 0$ and one for $f \le 0$. In this paper, we develop a set of algorithms that can be implemented by symbolic computation. Based on these algorithms, procedures for verifying linear information inequalities and identities are devised. Compared with LP-based algorithms, our procedures can produce analytical proofs that are both human-verifiable and free of numerical errors. Our procedures are also more efficient computationally. For constrained inequalities, by taking advantage of the algebraic structure of the problem, the size of the LP that needs to be solved can be significantly reduced. For identities, instead of solving two LPs, the identity can be verified directly with very little computation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Lower Bound on Derivatives of Costa's Differential Entropy

Several conjectures concern the lower bound for the differential entropy $H(X_t)$ of an $n$-dimensional random vector $X_t$ introduced by Costa. Cheng and Geng conjectured that $H(X_t)$ is completely monotone, that is, $C_1(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge0$. McKean conjectured that Gaussian $X_{Gt}$ achieves the minimum of $(-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)$ under certain conditions, that is, $C_2(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge(-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_{Gt})$. McKean's conjecture was only considered in the univariate case before: $C_2(1,1)$ and $C_2(2,1)$ were proved by McKean and $C_2(i,1),i=3,4,5$ were proved by Zhang-Anantharam-Geng under the log-concave condition. In this paper, we prove $C_2(1,n)$, $C_2(2,n)$ and observe that McKean's conjecture might not be true for $n>1$ and $m>2$. We further propose a weaker version $C_3(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge(-1)^{m+1}\frac{1}{n}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_{Gt})$ and prove $C_3(3,2)$, $C_3(3,3)$, $C_3(3,4)$, $C_3(4,2)$ under the log-concave condition. A systematical procedure to prove $C_l(m,n)$ is proposed based on semidefinite programming and the results mentioned above are proved using this procedure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Prove Costa's Entropy Power Inequality and High Order Inequality for Differential Entropy with Semidefinite Programming

Costa's entropy power inequality is an important generalization of Shannon's entropy power inequality. Related with Costa's entropy power inequality and a conjecture proposed by McKean in 1966, Cheng-Geng recently conjectured that $D(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(\partial^m/\partial^m t)H(X_t)\ge0$, where $X_t$ is the $n$-dimensional random variable in Costa's entropy power inequality and $H(X_t)$ the differential entropy of $X_t$. $D(1,n)$ and $D(2,n)$ were proved by Costa as consequences of Costa's entropy power inequality. Cheng-Geng proved $D(3,1)$ and $D(4,1)$. In this paper, we propose a systematical procedure to prove $D(m,n)$ and Costa's entropy power inequality based on semidefinite programming. Using software packages based on this procedure, we prove $D(3,n)$ for $n=2,3,4$ and give a new proof for Costa's entropy power inequality. We also show that with the currently known constraints, $D(5,1)$ and $D(4,2)$ cannot be proved with the procedure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access