Paper detail

Proving Information Inequalities and Identities with Symbolic Computation

Proving linear inequalities and identities of Shannon's information measures, possibly with linear constraints on the information measures, is an important problem in information theory. For this purpose, ITIP and other variant algorithms have been developed and implemented, which are all based on solving a linear program (LP). In particular, an identity $f = 0$ is verified by solving two LPs, one for $f \ge 0$ and one for $f \le 0$. In this paper, we develop a set of algorithms that can be implemented by symbolic computation. Based on these algorithms, procedures for verifying linear information inequalities and identities are devised. Compared with LP-based algorithms, our procedures can produce analytical proofs that are both human-verifiable and free of numerical errors. Our procedures are also more efficient computationally. For constrained inequalities, by taking advantage of the algebraic structure of the problem, the size of the LP that needs to be solved can be significantly reduced. For identities, instead of solving two LPs, the identity can be verified directly with very little computation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.