Paper detail

Lower Bound on Derivatives of Costa's Differential Entropy

Several conjectures concern the lower bound for the differential entropy $H(X_t)$ of an $n$-dimensional random vector $X_t$ introduced by Costa. Cheng and Geng conjectured that $H(X_t)$ is completely monotone, that is, $C_1(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge0$. McKean conjectured that Gaussian $X_{Gt}$ achieves the minimum of $(-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)$ under certain conditions, that is, $C_2(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge(-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_{Gt})$. McKean's conjecture was only considered in the univariate case before: $C_2(1,1)$ and $C_2(2,1)$ were proved by McKean and $C_2(i,1),i=3,4,5$ were proved by Zhang-Anantharam-Geng under the log-concave condition. In this paper, we prove $C_2(1,n)$, $C_2(2,n)$ and observe that McKean's conjecture might not be true for $n>1$ and $m>2$. We further propose a weaker version $C_3(m,n): (-1)^{m+1}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_t)\ge(-1)^{m+1}\frac{1}{n}(d^m/d^m t)H(X_{Gt})$ and prove $C_3(3,2)$, $C_3(3,3)$, $C_3(3,4)$, $C_3(4,2)$ under the log-concave condition. A systematical procedure to prove $C_l(m,n)$ is proposed based on semidefinite programming and the results mentioned above are proved using this procedure.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.