Abstract

A kk-box B=(R1,...,Rk)B=(R_1,...,R_k), where each RiR_i is a closed interval on the real line, is defined to be the Cartesian product R1×R2×...×RkR_1\times R_2\times ...\times R_k. If each RiR_i is a unit length interval, we call BB a kk-cube. Boxicity of a graph GG, denoted as $\boxi(G)$, is the minimum integer kk such that GG is an intersection graph of kk-boxes. Similarly, the cubicity of GG, denoted as $\cubi(G)$, is the minimum integer kk such that GG is an intersection graph of kk-cubes. It was shown in [L. Sunil Chandran, Mathew C. Francis, and Naveen Sivadasan: Representing graphs as the intersection of axis-parallel cubes. MCDES-2008, IISc Centenary Conference, available at CoRR, abs/cs/ 0607092, 2006.] that, for a graph GG with maximum degree ΔΔ, $\cubi(G)\leq \lceil 4(Δ+1)\log n\rceil$. In this paper, we show that, for a kk-degenerate graph GG, $\cubi(G) \leq (k+2) \lceil 2e \log n \rceil$. Since kk is at most ΔΔ and can be much lower, this clearly is a stronger result. This bound is tight. We also give an efficient deterministic algorithm that runs in O(n2k)O(n^2k) time to output a 8k(⌈2.42log⁡n⌉+1)8k(\lceil 2.42 \log n\rceil + 1) dimensional cube representation for GG. An important consequence of the above result is that if the crossing number of a graph GG is tt, then $\boxi(G)$ is O(t1/4⌈log⁡t⌉3/4)O(t^{1/4}{\lceil\log t\rceil}^{3/4}) . This bound is tight up to a factor of O((log⁡t)1/4)O((\log t)^{1/4}). We also show that, if GG has nn vertices, then $\cubi(G)$ is O(log⁡n+t1/4log⁡t)O(\log n + t^{1/4}\log t). Using our bound for the cubicity of kk-degenerate graphs we show that cubicity of almost all graphs in G(n,m)\mathcal{G}(n,m) model is O(davlog⁡n)O(d_{av}\log n), where davd_{av} denotes the average degree of the graph under consideration.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.