BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Klemens Esterle

Klemens Esterle contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
RoboticsArtificial IntelligenceMultiagent Systems

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Spatiotemporal motion planning with combinatorial reasoning for autonomous driving

Motion planning for urban environments with numerous moving agents can be viewed as a combinatorial problem. With passing an obstacle before, after, right or left, there are multiple options an autonomous vehicle could choose to execute. These combinatorial aspects need to be taken into account in the planning framework. We address this problem by proposing a novel planning approach that combines trajectory planning and maneuver reasoning. We define a classification for dynamic obstacles along a reference curve that allows us to extract tactical decision sequences. We separate longitudinal and lateral movement to speed up the optimization-based trajectory planning. To map the set of obtained trajectories to maneuver variants, we define a semantic language to describe them. This allows us to choose an optimal trajectory while also ensuring maneuver consistency over time. We demonstrate the capabilities of our approach for a scenario that is still widely considered to be challenging.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Experience-Based Heuristic Search: Robust Motion Planning with Deep Q-Learning

Interaction-aware planning for autonomous driving requires an exploration of a combinatorial solution space when using conventional search- or optimization-based motion planners. With Deep Reinforcement Learning, optimal driving strategies for such problems can be derived also for higher-dimensional problems. However, these methods guarantee optimality of the resulting policy only in a statistical sense, which impedes their usage in safety critical systems, such as autonomous vehicles. Thus, we propose the Experience-Based-Heuristic-Search algorithm, which overcomes the statistical failure rate of a Deep-reinforcement-learning-based planner and still benefits computationally from the pre-learned optimal policy. Specifically, we show how experiences in the form of a Deep Q-Network can be integrated as heuristic into a heuristic search algorithm. We benchmark our algorithm in the field of path planning in semi-structured valet parking scenarios. There, we analyze the accuracy of such estimates and demonstrate the computational advantages and robustness of our method. Our method may encourage further investigation of the applicability of reinforcement-learning-based planning in the field of self-driving vehicles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Optimal Behavior Planning for Autonomous Driving: A Generic Mixed-Integer Formulation

Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) has been identified as a suitable approach for finding an optimal solution to the behavior planning problem with low runtimes. Logical constraints and continuous equations are optimized alongside. However, it has only been formulated for a straight road, omitting common situations such as taking turns at intersections. This has prevented the model from being used in reality so far. Based on a triple integrator model formulation, we compute the orientation of the vehicle and model it in a disjunctive manner. That allows us to formulate linear constraints to account for the non-holonomy and collision avoidance. These constraints are approximations, for which we introduce the theory. We show the applicability in two benchmark scenarios and prove the feasibility by solving the same models using nonlinear optimization. This new model will allow researchers to leverage the benefits of MIQP, such as logical constraints, or global optimality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

BARK: Open Behavior Benchmarking in Multi-Agent Environments

Predicting and planning interactive behaviors in complex traffic situations presents a challenging task. Especially in scenarios involving multiple traffic participants that interact densely, autonomous vehicles still struggle to interpret situations and to eventually achieve their own mission goal. As driving tests are costly and challenging scenarios are hard to find and reproduce, simulation is widely used to develop, test, and benchmark behavior models. However, most simulations rely on datasets and simplistic behavior models for traffic participants and do not cover the full variety of real-world, interactive human behaviors. In this work, we introduce BARK, an open-source behavior benchmarking environment designed to mitigate the shortcomings stated above. In BARK, behavior models are (re-)used for planning, prediction, and simulation. A range of models is currently available, such as Monte-Carlo Tree Search and Reinforcement Learning-based behavior models. We use a public dataset and sampling-based scenario generation to show the inter-exchangeability of behavior models in BARK. We evaluate how well the models used cope with interactions and how robust they are towards exchanging behavior models. Our evaluation shows that BARK provides a suitable framework for a systematic development of behavior models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Formalizing Traffic Rules for Machine Interpretability

Autonomous vehicles need to be designed to abide by the same rules that humans follow. This is challenging, because traffic rules are fuzzy and not well defined, making them incomprehensible to machines. Satisfaction cannot be incorporated in a planning component without proper formalization, nor can it be monitored and verified during simulation or testing. However, no research work has provided a consistent set of machine-interpretable traffic rules for a given operational driving domain. In this paper, we propose a methodology for the legal study and formalization of traffic rules in a formal language. We use Linear Temporal Logic as a formal specification language to describe temporal behaviors, capable of capturing a wide range of traffic rules. We contribute a formalized set of traffic rules for dual carriageways and evaluate the effectiveness of our formalized rules on a public dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access