BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zifei Han

Zifei Han contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Study on the Power Parameter in Power Prior Bayesian Analysis

The power prior and its variations have been proven to be a useful class of informative priors in Bayesian inference due to their flexibility in incorporating the historical information by raising the likelihood of the historical data to a fractional power δ. The derivation of the marginal likelihood based on the original power prior,and its variation, the normalized power prior, introduces a scaling factor C(δ) in the form of a prior predictive distribution with powered likelihood. In this paper, we show that the scaling factor might be infinite for some positive δ with conventionally used initial priors, which would change the admissible set of the power parameter. This result seems to have been almost completely ignored in the literature. We then illustrate that such a phenomenon may jeopardize the posterior inference under the power priors when the initial prior of the model parameters is improper. The main findings of this paper suggest that special attention should be paid when the suggested level of borrowing is close to 0, while the actual optimum might be below the suggested value. We use a normal linear model as an example for illustrative purposes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Approximate Reference Prior for Gaussian Random Fields

Reference priors are theoretically attractive for the analysis of geostatistical data since they enable automatic Bayesian analysis and have desirable Bayesian and frequentist properties. But their use is hindered by computational hurdles that make their application in practice challenging. In this work, we derive a new class of default priors that approximate reference priors for the parameters of some Gaussian random fields. It is based on an approximation to the integrated likelihood of the covariance parameters derived from the spectral approximation of stationary random fields. This prior depends on the structure of the mean function and the spectral density of the model evaluated at a set of spectral points associated with an auxiliary regular grid. In addition to preserving the desirable Bayesian and frequentist properties, these approximate reference priors are more stable, and their computations are much less onerous than those of exact reference priors. Unlike exact reference priors, the marginal approximate reference prior of correlation parameter is always proper, regardless of the mean function or the smoothness of the correlation function. This property has important consequences for covariance model selection. An illustration comparing default Bayesian analyses is provided with a data set of lead pollution in Galicia, Spain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Normalized Power Prior Bayesian Analysis

The elicitation of power priors, based on the availability of historical data, is realized by raising the likelihood function of the historical data to a fractional power δ, which quantifies the degree of discounting of the historical information in making inference with the current data. When δ is not pre-specified and is treated as random, it can be estimated from the data using Bayesian updating paradigm. However, in the original form of the joint power prior Bayesian approach, certain positive constants before the likelihood of the historical data could be multiplied when different settings of sufficient statistics are employed. This would change the power priors with different constants, and hence the likelihood principle is violated. In this article, we investigate a normalized power prior approach which obeys the likelihood principle and is a modified form of the joint power prior. The optimality properties of the normalized power prior in the sense of minimizing the weighted Kullback-Leibler divergence is investigated. By examining the posteriors of several commonly used distributions, we show that the discrepancy between the historical and the current data can be well quantified by the power parameter under the normalized power prior setting. Efficient algorithms to compute the scale factor is also proposed. In addition, we illustrate the use of the normalized power prior Bayesian analysis with three data examples, and provide an implementation with an R package NPP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Information About Covariance Parameters in Gaussian Matérn Random Fields

The Matern family of covariance functions is currently the most commonly used for the analysis of geostatistical data due to its ability to describe different smoothness behaviors. Yet, in many applications the smoothness parameter is set at an arbitrary value. This practice is due partly to computational challenges faced when attempting to estimate all covariance parameters and partly to unqualified claims in the literature stating that geostatistical data have little or no information about the smoothness parameter. This work critically investigates this claim and shows it is not true in general. Specifically, it is shown that the information the data have about the correlation parameters varies substantially depending on the true model and sampling design and, in particular, the information about the smoothness parameter can be large, in some cases larger than the information about the range parameter. In light of these findings, we suggest to reassess the aforementioned practice and instead establish inferences from data-based estimates of both range and smoothness parameters, especially for strongly dependent non-smooth processes observed on irregular sampling designs. A data set of daily rainfall totals is used to motivate the discussion and gauge this common practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access