Researcher profile

Kevin R. Payne

Kevin R. Payne contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Interplay between nonlinear potential theory and fully nonlinear elliptic PDEs

We discuss one of the many topics that illustrate the interaction of Blaine Lawson's deep geometric and analytic insights. The first author is extremely grateful to have had the pleasure of collaborating with Blaine over many enjoyable years. The topic to be discussed concerns the fruitful interplay between nonlinear potential theory; that is, the study of subharmonics with respect to a general constraint set in the 2-jet bundle and the study of subsolutions and supersolutions of a nonlinear (degenerate) elliptic PDE. The main results include (but are not limited to) the validity of the comparison principle and the existence and uniqueness to solutions to the relevant Dirichlet problems on domains which are suitably "pseudoconvex". The methods employed are geometric and flexible as well as being very general on the potential theory side, which is interesting in its own right. Moreover, in many important geometric contexts no natutral operator may be present. On the other hand, the potential theoretic approach can yield results on the PDE side in terms of non standard structual conditions on a given differential operator.

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison principles by monotonicity and duality for constant coefficient nonlinear potential theory and PDEs

We prove comparison principles for nonlinear potential theories in euclidian spaces in a very straightforward manner from duality and monotonicity. We shall also show how to deduce comparison principles for nonlinear differential operators, a program seemingly different from the first. However, we shall marry these two points of view, for a wide variety of equations, under something called the correspondence principle. In potential theory one is given a constraint set F on the 2-jets of a function, and the boundary of F gives a differential equation. There are many differential operators, suitably organized around F, which give the same equation. So potential theory gives a great strengthening and simplification to the operator theory. Conversely, the set of operators associated to F can have much to say about the potential theory. An object of central interest here is that of monotonicity, which explains and unifies much of the theory. We shall always assume that the maximal monotonicity cone for a potential theory has interior. This is automatic for gradient-free equations where monotonicity is simply the standard degenerate ellipticity and properness assumptions. We show that for each such potential theory F there is an associated canonical operator, defined on the entire 2-jet space and having all the desired properties. Furthermore, comparison holds for this operator on any domain which admits a regular strictly M-subharmonic function, where M is a monotonicity subequation for F. On the operator side there is an important dichotomy into the unconstrained cases and constrained cases, where the operator must be restricted to a proper subset of 2-jet space. These two cases are best illustrated by the canonical operators and Dirichlet-Garding operators, respectively. The article gives many, many examples from pure and applied mathematics, and also from theoretical physics.

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison principles for viscosity solutions of elliptic branches of fully nonlinear equations independent of the gradient

The validity of the comparison principle in variable coefficient fully nonlinear gradient free potential theory is examined and then used to prove the comparison principle for fully nonlinear partial differential equations which determine a suitable potential theory. The approach combines the notions of proper elliptic branches inspired by Krylov (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1995) with the monotonicity-duality method initiated by Harvey and Lawson (Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2009). In the variable coefficient nonlinear potential theory, a special role is played by the Hausdorff continuity of the proper elliptic map $Θ$ which defines the potential theory. In the applications to nonlinear equations defined by an operator $F$, structural conditions on $F$ will be determined for which there is a correspondence principle between $Θ$-subharmonics/superharmonics and admissible viscosity sub and supersolutions of the nonlinear equation and for which comparison for the equation follows from the associated compatible potential theory. General results and explicit models of interest from differential geometry will be examined.

preprint2019arXiv

Principal eigenvalues for k-Hessian operators by maximum principle methods

For fully nonlinear $k$-Hessian operators on bounded strictly $(k-1)$-convex domains $Ω$ in ${\mathbb R}^N$, a characterization of the principal eigenvalue associated to a $k$-convex and negative principal eigenfunction will be given as the supremum over values of a spectral parameter for which admissible viscosity supersolutions obey a minimum principle. The admissibility condition is phrased in terms of the natural closed convex cone $Σ_k$ in the space of symmetric N by N matrices, which is an elliptic set in the sense of Krylov [Trans. AMS, 1995] and which corresponds to using $k$-convex functions as admissibility constraints in the formulation of viscosity subsolutions and supersolutions. Moreover, the associated principal eigenfunction is constructed by an iterative viscosity solution technique, which exploits a compactness property which results from the establishment of a global Hölder estimate for the unique $k$-convex solutions of the approximating equations.