Paper detail

On viscosity solutions to the Dirichlet problem for elliptic branches of nonhomogeneous fully nonlinear equations

For scalar fully nonlinear partial differential equations depending on the Hessian andspatial coordinates, we present a general theory for obtaining comparison principles and well posedness for the associated Dirichlet problem with continuous boundary data. In particular, we treat admissible viscosity solutions of elliptic branches of the equation, where the nonlinearity need not be monotone on all of the space of symmetric N by N matrices. An elliptic branch (in the sense of Krylov, 1995) of the equation is encoded by a set valued map from the coordinate domain into the elliptic subsets of the symmetric matrices (an elliptic map). The nonlinearity will be monotone along this map and the degenerate elliptic PDE is replaced by the a differential inclusion. Weak solutions to such differential inclusions are defined by using the notion given by Harvey-Lawson (2009) in a pointwise manner. If the elliptic map is uniformly upper semicontinuous, we show that the comparison principle holds for these weak solutions and that Perron's method yields a unique continuous solution to the associated abstract Dirichlet problem provided that the boundary is suitably convex with respect to the elliptic mapand its dual in the sense of Harvey and Lawson. When the map encodes an elliptic branch of a given PDE, these soluitions are shown to be admissible viscosity solutions of the PDE problem. Various applications are described in terms of structural conditions which ensure the existence of the needed elliptic map. Examples include non-totally degenerate equations and equations involving the eigenvalues of the Hessian and their perturbations. In certain situations, the methods employed here will be shown to operate freely, while classical viscosity approaches may not.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.