Paper detail

Interplay between nonlinear potential theory and fully nonlinear elliptic PDEs

We discuss one of the many topics that illustrate the interaction of Blaine Lawson's deep geometric and analytic insights. The first author is extremely grateful to have had the pleasure of collaborating with Blaine over many enjoyable years. The topic to be discussed concerns the fruitful interplay between nonlinear potential theory; that is, the study of subharmonics with respect to a general constraint set in the 2-jet bundle and the study of subsolutions and supersolutions of a nonlinear (degenerate) elliptic PDE. The main results include (but are not limited to) the validity of the comparison principle and the existence and uniqueness to solutions to the relevant Dirichlet problems on domains which are suitably "pseudoconvex". The methods employed are geometric and flexible as well as being very general on the potential theory side, which is interesting in its own right. Moreover, in many important geometric contexts no natutral operator may be present. On the other hand, the potential theoretic approach can yield results on the PDE side in terms of non standard structual conditions on a given differential operator.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.