Researcher profile

Kensuke Tanioka

Kensuke Tanioka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Methodology Computer Vision eess.IV Machine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline

5works

0followers

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Principal component-guided sparse reduced-rank regression

Reduced-rank regression estimates regression coefficients by imposing a low-rank constraint on the matrix of regression coefficients, thereby accounting for correlations among response variables. To further improve predictive accuracy and model interpretability, several regularized reduced-rank regression methods have been proposed. However, these existing methods cannot bias the regression coefficients toward the leading principal component directions while accounting for the correlation structure among explanatory variables. In addition, when the explanatory variables exhibit a group structure, the correlation structure within each group cannot be adequately incorporated. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method that introduces pcLasso into the reduced-rank regression framework. The proposed method improves predictive accuracy by accounting for the correlation among response variables while strongly biasing the matrix of regression coefficients toward principal component directions with large variance. Furthermore, even in settings where the explanatory variables possess a group structure, the proposed method is capable of explicitly incorporating this structure into the estimation process. Finally, we illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through numerical simulations and real data application.

preprint2023arXiv

Deep-learning models in medical image analysis: Detection of esophagitis from the Kvasir Dataset

Early detection of esophagitis is important because this condition can progress to cancer if left untreated. However, the accuracies of different deep learning models in detecting esophagitis have yet to be compared. Thus, this study aimed to compare the accuracies of convolutional neural network models (GoogLeNet, ResNet-50, MobileNet V2, and MobileNet V3) in detecting esophagitis from the open Kvasir dataset of endoscopic images. Results showed that among the models, GoogLeNet achieved the highest F1-scores. Based on the average of true positive rate, MobileNet V3 predicted esophagitis more confidently than the other models. The results obtained using the models were also compared with those obtained using SHapley Additive exPlanations and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping.

preprint2022arXiv

Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Artifact Removal in Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Imaging

Endoscopic images typically contain several artifacts. The artifacts significantly impact image analysis result in computer-aided diagnosis. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a type of deep learning, can removes such artifacts. Various architectures have been proposed for the CNNs, and the accuracy of artifact removal varies depending on the choice of architecture. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the artifact removal accuracy, depending on the selected architecture. In this study, we focus on endoscopic surgical instruments as artifacts, and determine and discuss the artifact removal accuracy using seven different CNN architectures.

preprint2022arXiv

Rules Ensemble Method with Group Lasso for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation

The increasing scientific attention given to precision medicine based on real-world data has led many recent studies to clarify the relationships between treatment effects and patient characteristics. However, this is challenging because of ubiquitous heterogeneity in the treatment effect for individuals and the real-world data on their background being complex and noisy. Because of their flexibility, various heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) machine learning (ML) estimation methods have been proposed. However, most ML methods incorporate black-box models that hamper direct interpretation of the interrelationships between individuals' characteristics and the treatments' effects. This study proposes an ML method for estimating HTE based on the rule ensemble method termed RuleFit. The main advantage of RuleFit are interpretability and accuracy. However, HTEs are always defined in the potential outcome framework, and RuleFit cannot be applied directly. Thus, we modified RuleFit and proposed a method to estimate HTEs that directly interpret the interrelationships among the individuals' features from the model.

preprint2021arXiv

Concordance Rate of a Four-Quadrant Plot for Repeated Measurements

Before new clinical measurement methods are implemented in clinical practice, it must be confirmed whether their results are equivalent to those of existing methods. The agreement of the trend between these methods is evaluated using the four-quadrant plot, which describes the trend of change in each difference of the two measurement methods' values in sequential time points, and the plot's concordance rate, which is calculated using the sum of data points in the four-quadrant plot that agree with this trend divided by the number of all accepted data points. However, the conventional concordance rate does not consider the covariance between the data on individual subjects, which may affect its proper evaluation. Therefore, we proposed a new concordance rate calculated by each individual according to the number of agreement. Moreover, this proposed method can set a parameter that the minimum concordant number between two measurement techniques. The parameter can provide a more detailed interpretation of the degree of agreement. A numerical simulation conducted with several factors indicated that the proposed method resulted in a more accurate evaluation. We also showed a real data and compared the proposed method with the conventional approach. Then, we concluded the discussion with the implementation in clinical studies.