Source author record

Toshio Shimokawa

Toshio Shimokawa appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rules Ensemble Method with Group Lasso for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation

The increasing scientific attention given to precision medicine based on real-world data has led many recent studies to clarify the relationships between treatment effects and patient characteristics. However, this is challenging because of ubiquitous heterogeneity in the treatment effect for individuals and the real-world data on their background being complex and noisy. Because of their flexibility, various heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) machine learning (ML) estimation methods have been proposed. However, most ML methods incorporate black-box models that hamper direct interpretation of the interrelationships between individuals' characteristics and the treatments' effects. This study proposes an ML method for estimating HTE based on the rule ensemble method termed RuleFit. The main advantage of RuleFit are interpretability and accuracy. However, HTEs are always defined in the potential outcome framework, and RuleFit cannot be applied directly. Thus, we modified RuleFit and proposed a method to estimate HTEs that directly interpret the interrelationships among the individuals' features from the model.

preprint2021arXiv

Concordance Rate of a Four-Quadrant Plot for Repeated Measurements

Before new clinical measurement methods are implemented in clinical practice, it must be confirmed whether their results are equivalent to those of existing methods. The agreement of the trend between these methods is evaluated using the four-quadrant plot, which describes the trend of change in each difference of the two measurement methods' values in sequential time points, and the plot's concordance rate, which is calculated using the sum of data points in the four-quadrant plot that agree with this trend divided by the number of all accepted data points. However, the conventional concordance rate does not consider the covariance between the data on individual subjects, which may affect its proper evaluation. Therefore, we proposed a new concordance rate calculated by each individual according to the number of agreement. Moreover, this proposed method can set a parameter that the minimum concordant number between two measurement techniques. The parameter can provide a more detailed interpretation of the degree of agreement. A numerical simulation conducted with several factors indicated that the proposed method resulted in a more accurate evaluation. We also showed a real data and compared the proposed method with the conventional approach. Then, we concluded the discussion with the implementation in clinical studies.