Source author record

Ken Yee

Ken Yee appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint1995arXiv

Demons and Abelian Projection QCD: Action and Crossover

I evaluate S_{APQCD}, the exact action of Abelian projection QCD, using the microcanonical demon method. Starting with a trial action consisting of L=1, L=2, & L=3 LxL plaquettes plus a Smit-van-der-Sijs magnetic monopole ``mass'' operator, I show that coefficients of the L=2 and L=3 plaquettes vanish at all beta_{SU2}. In fact, at strong coupling S_{APQCD} is essentially the 1x1 compact QED action with beta_{U1}=beta_{SU2}/2. Beyond beta_{SU2}>=2, S_{APQCD} gains an exogenous negative 1x1x1 magnetic monopole mass shift. Note that my approach differs fundamentally from the Smit-van-der-Sijs approach in that I do not make an a priori assumption about monopole or plaquette size in S_{APQCD}. Indeed, these results suggest that QCD monopoles are pointlike, in contrast to the ``effective'' condensation picture put forth by Smit and van der Sijs.

preprint1994arXiv

Abelian Action for Quark Confinement: A Direct Evaluation

We evaluate S_{APQCD}, the Abelian projection QCD(APQCD) action nonperturbatively on the lattice. For SU(2), we find S_{APQCD} at strong coupling is essentially the compact QED(CQED) action. At weaker coupling, we find S_{APQCD} mutates: it gains additional operators, including an exogenous NEGATIVE magnetic monopole mass shift. As a corollary, since monopoles are condensed in CQED our results prove (vicariously) that SU(2) monopoles are condensed. S_{APQCD} for SU(3) has similar behavior.

preprint1994arXiv

Monopoles and Quark Confinement: Introduction and Overview

We (try to) pedagogically explain how monopoles arise in QCD, why maximal Abelian(MA) gauge is ``special'' for monopole study, the Abelian projection in MA gauge, its resultant degrees of freedom(photons, monopoles and charged matter fields), and the QCD-equivalent action in terms of these degrees of freedom. Then we turn to more recent developments in the subject: Abelian dominance, large $N$ behavior of Abelian projected QCD, mass of the charged matter fields, notion of an effective photon-monopole action obtained by integrating out the charged matter fields, and problems encountered in the recent evaluation of this effective action using the microcanonical demon method on the lattice.

preprint1994arXiv

Temperature Dependence of Extended and Fractional SU(3) Monopole Currents

We examine in pure SU(3) the dependence of extended monopole current k and cross-species extended monopole current k^{cross} on temperature t, monopole size L, and fractional monopole charge 1/q. We find that features of both k and k^{cross} are sensitive to t for a range of L and q. In particular, the spatial-temporal asymmetry ratios of both k and k^{cross} are sensitive over a range of L and q to the SU(3) deconfinement transition. The motivation for studying cross, extended, and fractional monopoles in SU(3) is given.

preprint1993arXiv

Compact QED in Landau Gauge: a lattice gauge fixing case study

We derive different representations of compact QED fixed to Landau gauge by the lattice Faddeev-Popov procedure. Our analysis finds that (A)Nielsen-Olesen vortices arising from the compactness of the gauge-fixing action are {\it quenched\/}, that is, the Faddeev-Popov determinant cancels them out and they do not influence correlation functions such as the photon propagator; (B)Dirac strings are responsible for the nonzero mass pole of the photon propagator. Since in $D=3+1$ the photon mass undergoes a rapid drop to zero at $β_c$, the deconfinement point, this result predicts that Dirac strings must be sufficiently dilute at $β> β_c$. Indeed, numerical simulations reveal that the string density undergoes a rapid drop to near zero at $β\sim β_c$.

preprint1993arXiv

Properties of the Abelian Projection Fields in $SU(N)$ Lattice Gluodynamics

't~Hooft's abelian projection of $SU(N)$ gauge theory yields $N$ mutually constrained, compact abelian fields which are permutationally equivalent. We formulate the notion of ``species permutation'' symmetry of the $N$ abelian projection fields and discuss its consequences for cross-species correlators. We show that at large $N$ cross-species interactions are ${1\over N}$ suppressed relative to same-species interactions. Numerical simulations at $N=3$ support our symmetry arguments and reveal the existence of inter-species interactions of size ${\cal O\/}\bigl({1\over N-1}\bigr)$ as analytically predicted.

preprint1992arXiv

Gauge Dependence of Effective Quark Mass and Matrix Elements in Gaugefixed Large $N$ Strong Coupling Lattice QCD

In conjunction with recent numerical \hbox{$λ~\partial_0 A_0 + \nabla\cdot\vec{A} =0$} ``$λ$-gauge'' results reported in a companion paper, we construct an $N\to\infty$ Wilson loop picture of $λ$-gaugefixing in which (I)the $λ$-gauge expectation value of a link chain $C$ is the weighted sum over Wilson loops made by joining to $C$ all selfavoiding chains $\widetilde{C}$ closing $C$. (II)Weights $A_{\widetilde{C}}$, containing all the $λ$-dependence, are given by the $β=0$ $λ$-gauge expectation value of $\widetilde{C}$. (III)$A_{\widetilde{C}}$ equals path-products of coefficients from the trace expansion of the gaugefixing Boltzmann weight. From (II) and (III) we deduce formulas for $β=0$ quark matrix elements. We find that $M_q^{(λ)}$ decreases with increasing $λ$; the quark propagator dispersion relation is not covariant when $λ\ne 1$; and $ΔI=1/2$ matching coefficients are $λ$-independent. These strong coupling features are qualitatively consistent with numerical $β=5.7$ and $6.0$ results briefly described here for comparison purposes but mainly presented in a companion paper.