Source author record

Keisuke Kondo

Keisuke Kondo appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Anisotropy of the transport properties of NdFeAs(O,F) thin films grown on vicinal substrates

NdFeAs(O,F) thin films having different fluorine contents were grown on 5 deg. or 10 deg. vicinal cut MgO and CaF2 single crystalline substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. Structural characterisations by reflection high-energy electron diffraction and x-ray diffraction confirmed the epitaxial growth of NdFeAs(O,F). The resistivities of the ab-plane and along the c-axis were derived from the resistivity measurements in the longitudinal and transversal directions. The c-axis resistivity was always higher than the ab-plane resistivity, resulting from the anisotropic electronic structure. The resistivity anisotropy at 300 K was almost constant in the range of 50-90 irrespective of the F content. On the other hand, the resistivity anisotropy at 56 K showed a strong fluorine dependence: the resistivity anisotropy was over 200 for the films with optimum F contents (superconducting transition temperature Tc around 50 K), whereas the resistivity anisotropy was around 70 for the films in the under-doped regime (Tc between 35 and 45 K). The mass anisotropy are the effective masses along the c-axis and on the ab-plane) close to Tc derived from the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau approach using the angular-dependency of the ab-plane resistivity was in the range from 2 to 5. On the assumption that the square of the mass anisotropy is equal to the resistivity anisotropy, those values are small compared to the normal state anisotropy.