BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Karthyek Murthy

Karthyek Murthy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningMethodologyq-fin.RMmath.OCmath.STq-fin.PMStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Combining Retrospective Approximation with Importance Sampling for Optimising Conditional Value at Risk

This paper investigates the use of retrospective approximation solution paradigm in solving risk-averse optimization problems effectively via importance sampling (IS). While IS serves as a prominent means for tackling the large sample requirements in estimating tail risk measures such as Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), its use in optimization problems driven by CVaR is complicated by the need to tailor the IS change of measure differently to different optimization iterates and the circularity which arises as a consequence. The proposed algorithm overcomes these challenges by employing a univariate IS transformation offering uniform variance reduction in a retrospective approximation procedure well-suited for tuning the IS parameter choice. The resulting simulation based approximation scheme enjoys both the computational efficiency bestowed by retrospective approximation and logarithmically efficient variance reduction offered by importance sampling

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Confidence Regions in Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimation

Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization estimators are obtained as solutions of min-max problems in which the statistician selects a parameter minimizing the worst-case loss among all probability models within a certain distance (in a Wasserstein sense) from the underlying empirical measure. While motivated by the need to identify optimal model parameters or decision choices that are robust to model misspecification, these distributionally robust estimators recover a wide range of regularized estimators, including square-root lasso and support vector machines, among others, as particular cases. This paper studies the asymptotic normality of these distributionally robust estimators as well as the properties of an optimal (in a suitable sense) confidence region induced by the Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization formulation. In addition, key properties of min-max distributionally robust optimization problems are also studied, for example, we show that distributionally robust estimators regularize the loss based on its derivative and we also derive general sufficient conditions which show the equivalence between the min-max distributionally robust optimization problem and the corresponding max-min formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimizing tail risks using an importance sampling based extrapolation for heavy-tailed objectives

Motivated by the prominence of Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) as a measure for tail risk in settings affected by uncertainty, we develop a new formula for approximating CVaR based optimization objectives and their gradients from limited samples. A key difficulty that limits the widespread practical use of these optimization formulations is the large amount of data required by the state-of-the-art sample average approximation schemes to approximate the CVaR objective with high fidelity. Unlike the state-of-the-art sample average approximations which require impractically large amounts of data in tail probability regions, the proposed approximation scheme exploits the self-similarity of heavy-tailed distributions to extrapolate data from suitable lower quantiles. The resulting approximations are shown to be statistically consistent and are amenable for optimization by means of conventional gradient descent. The approximation is guided by means of a systematic importance-sampling scheme whose asymptotic variance reduction properties are rigorously examined. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approximations and the ease of implementation points to the versatility of settings to which the approximation scheme can be applied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Data-driven Optimal Cost Selection for Distributionally Robust Optimization

Recently, (Blanchet, Kang, and Murhy 2016, and Blanchet, and Kang 2017) showed that several machine learning algorithms, such as square-root Lasso, Support Vector Machines, and regularized logistic regression, among many others, can be represented exactly as distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems. The distributional uncertainty is defined as a neighborhood centered at the empirical distribution. We propose a methodology which learns such neighborhood in a natural data-driven way. We show rigorously that our framework encompasses adaptive regularization as a particular case. Moreover, we demonstrate empirically that our proposed methodology is able to improve upon a wide range of popular machine learning estimators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access